Unofficial File parts/42042.dat
File Header:
0 Technic Bionicle Krana Su
0 Name: 42042.dat
0 Author: Santeri Piippo [arezey]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2014-05-23 [Philo] Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2014-05-25 [arezey] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 660 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify dulcaoin=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Needs more votes. (CN)Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun May 25 17:15:07 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
"No, Lewa, that's not a mask. Wearing it on your face is not healthy for you."
I really don't know about how to go with the author line since this is a joint effort one. I still think we should allow multiple author lines because of things like this.
The part number makes me wonder. Apparently both the Krana and the Krana holder use 42042?
The name "Su" is the name of this particular Krana in the Bionicle canon (which is like TLG-level official) so I used that.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
"No, Lewa, that's not a mask. Wearing it on your face is not healthy for you."
I really don't know about how to go with the author line since this is a joint effort one. I still think we should allow multiple author lines because of things like this.
The part number makes me wonder. Apparently both the Krana and the Krana holder use 42042?
The name "Su" is the name of this particular Krana in the Bionicle canon (which is like TLG-level official) so I used that.
At Sun May 25 17:35:04 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Just keep authorship, history line is perfect for my contribution! (I think you had much more work to to than I had!).
BTW, are you interested in other Krana? I think I have another...
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Just keep authorship, history line is perfect for my contribution! (I think you had much more work to to than I had!).
BTW, are you interested in other Krana? I think I have another...
At Sun May 25 19:25:02 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
Fair enough then..
I can go about tackling other meshes too, but that'll have to wait until Wednesday/Thursday before I can start.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
Fair enough then..
I can go about tackling other meshes too, but that'll have to wait until Wednesday/Thursday before I can start.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun May 25 22:05:05 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
Origin shifted slightly.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
Origin shifted slightly.
At Mon Jun 2 22:15:05 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks good, but are all the edge lines necessary?
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks good, but are all the edge lines necessary?
At Mon Jun 2 22:40:04 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes they are, keep in mind this part was 3D-scanned.
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes they are, keep in mind this part was 3D-scanned.
At Tue Jun 3 19:35:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
subfiled the connector
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
subfiled the connector
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Jun 4 21:30:03 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why is one of the edge-prims left behind?
And one of the other edge-prim is scaled in three dimensions.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why is one of the edge-prims left behind?
And one of the other edge-prim is scaled in three dimensions.
At Mon Jun 9 10:55:02 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
42042a.dat
Filesize: 665 byte - Errors found: 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEADER TESTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No errors detected!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BODY TESTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Line 18: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 0 0 -7.25 0 0 10 -10 0 0 0 -5 0 4-4edge.dat
Report generated on 2014-06-09 with DATHeader version 3.0.17.0
Scantime: 00:00:373 min:sec:ms
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
42042a.dat
Filesize: 665 byte - Errors found: 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEADER TESTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No errors detected!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BODY TESTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Line 18: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 0 0 -7.25 0 0 10 -10 0 0 0 -5 0 4-4edge.dat
Report generated on 2014-06-09 with DATHeader version 3.0.17.0
Scantime: 00:00:373 min:sec:ms
At Tue Dec 8 21:55:00 2015, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Unscaled 2d prim
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Unscaled 2d prim
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon May 7 18:40:01 2018, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
Use 42042 for the number. Bricklink has the wrong number for the "BION. HEAD, INTERM. PLATE" part (the "krana holder")
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
Use 42042 for the number. Bricklink has the wrong number for the "BION. HEAD, INTERM. PLATE" part (the "krana holder")
At Tue May 8 15:40:01 2018, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
There was meant to be an (at this point implied) "You're safe to ..." prepended to my previous comment. :)
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
There was meant to be an (at this point implied) "You're safe to ..." prepended to my previous comment. :)
At Sat Dec 15 20:10:04 2018 part 'parts/42042a.dat' was renamed to 'parts/42042.dat'.
At Tue Oct 11 12:05:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
Comments:
* No idea why the rings and the 4-4edge hasn't also been moved to the sub.
* References already official subfile:
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=s/42042s01
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
Comments:
* No idea why the rings and the 4-4edge hasn't also been moved to the sub.
* References already official subfile:
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=s/42042s01
At Wed Oct 12 13:50:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
When I said it was safe to use 42042 for the krana number, I meant for the various Krana, so A, B, C, et cetera are still appropriate. My comment was in reference to whether the krana and krana holder had the same design ID, which they do not. I believe it would still be appropriate here to have 42042A (or another as desired) for the Krana Su, with other letters for the other krana.
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
When I said it was safe to use 42042 for the krana number, I meant for the various Krana, so A, B, C, et cetera are still appropriate. My comment was in reference to whether the krana and krana holder had the same design ID, which they do not. I believe it would still be appropriate here to have 42042A (or another as desired) for the Krana Su, with other letters for the other krana.
3D View