Unofficial File parts/32288c02.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Electric Technic Motor 4.5V  6 x 17 x  5 with Light Grey Base Type 2
0 Name: 32288c02.dat
0 Author: Javier Orquera [kuramapika1]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
6 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSN)
Size: 844 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Electric Technic Motor 4.5V 6 x 17 x 5 Top
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Download: parts/32288.dat
Electric Technic Motor 4.5V 6 x 17 x 5 Base Type 2
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSN)
Electric Technic Motor 4.5V 6 x 17 x 5 Axle Type 2
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Download: parts/u9510.dat
~Electric Technic Motor 4.5V 6 x 17 x 5 Axle
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Download: parts/u9511.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Feb 27 18:50:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Comments:
Corrected file and header names.

At Thu Feb 27 20:20:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Could you please show us why we need a third version of this assembly?

At Thu Feb 27 20:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
+1

At Fri Feb 28 02:50:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: kuramapika1
Certification: novote
Comments:
I did this part because the part 32288c02 do not exist (at least for me), see this https://picclick.de/LEGO-RACER-8472-mit-Batteriemotor-Antrieb-umgebaut-nicht-223480849441.html.
The intention is to substitute the part 32288c02.

At Fri Feb 28 12:10:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
What dio you mean it does not exist for you? 32288c02 is on the Parts Tracker (https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=32288c02) but still need reviews before it can be released into the official library.

At Fri Feb 28 13:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: kuramapika1
Certification: novote
Comments:
I mean in real life; never find an image of that part. I am aware that the part 32288c02 exist in the ldraw part tracker list.

At Fri Feb 28 17:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
According to this post:

https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23897.html

there are only two.

At Fri Feb 28 19:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: kuramapika1
Certification: novote
Comments:
In real life there are two versions (as far as I know): part 32288c01 correspond to set 8472 and part 32288c03 (the one that I make with base type 3) correspond to set 5221, set 8279 and set 8307. The only diference are in the base color according to bricker.info.
The question I made is: to witch set correspond part 32288c02?

At Fri Feb 28 20:10:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Well, if something is wrong in the c02 assembly we should correct that one, not upload a third version.
Why do you think we need more version of the sub files and subpart you made?

At Fri Feb 28 21:05:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
For the base three subfiles are needed see:

https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23897-post-36139.html#pid36139

At Fri Feb 28 22:40:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: kuramapika1
Certification: novote
Comments:
If you are aware of the difference between the real part and the 32288c02 assembly submitted, why do you not make the corrections before?
If you dislike my work day that and I send a message to the part tracker admin asking the deletion of my part.
On the contrary, you can pay the same for part 32288c02 assembly if you like. Or discuss wath assembly we kept.

At Sat Feb 29 08:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm merely trying to point out that if there is somthing wrong in the c02 assembly we should correct that one.
I don't have this part. I know that Willy is also working on the errors in c02. Maybe you could together with him correct it?

I'll keep this Hold-vote since there is no third assembly. Making a third version is not the right way to correct 32288c02.
Looking forward to reviewing the result.

At Sat Feb 29 09:10:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
I just started working on this part a week ago and have only a small idea what's wrong with them. Also because I'm still waiting to get the real part I ordered at BL.

However it's not about like or dislike. It's about the fact that apparently there are only two versions of this motor into the wild.

My suggestions is therefore (since none of the parts have been officially released) that you submit your type 3 overwriting type 2 and asking the PT do delete type 3. You'll have also take into account the suggestions made for the naming in 32288c02.dat

This means also that your 32289c.dat has to overwrite 32289b.dat (don't take into account the original author - his work is total crap)

Take into account that 32289b.dat and 32289a.dat might share code. It's up to you if you wanna have a look at the code I posted at the forums. I step back from this part. Go ahead with your good work and let's get this baby official.

At Sat Feb 29 11:10:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
OK,
The difference between 32288c01 and 32288c02 is in the bottom part 32289a and 32289b.

What you should do is to change the subfile 32289s01. Remove any surface that is blocking it from being re-used in 32289b.
Then 32289a should be be changed to use 32289s01, adding all surface that makes it different from 32289b
Then, change 32289b. Re-use 32289s01, and add all the new surface you have made for "32289c".

Add the rear axle, now called s\3142s06, in 32288c02. It should become a ~Part, not a subpart.
Your new file s\3142s07 should also be a ~Part. Please ask Admin for u-partnumbers, and a change of parttype.

btw,
32288c01 have to be correted too. The long axle914, is out of position.

At Sat Feb 29 13:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: kuramapika1
Certification: novote
Comments:
Hello: As Holly-Wood say the subpart 32289b.dat is wrong (and the primary reason why I make my own subpart and the assembly and related files, except 32288.dat and 3142s06.dat).
Can you give me permission to ask the PT admin if he can delete part 32288c02 (and asosiated files) and rename my work whit proper names? I have no problem in doing that, especially renamed my files.

At Mon Mar 2 18:55:34 2020 part 'parts/32288c03.dat' was renamed to 'parts/32288c02.dat'.
At Mon Mar 2 19:00:01 2020 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Wed Mar 4 18:40:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Mar 4 19:35:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Comments:
Corrected part x916a to x916 in the code (my apologize).

At Sat Apr 18 19:10:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
At Tue May 26 21:20:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Comments:
A "big" update

At Mon Jul 13 23:15:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
can we please retitle "Complete Assembly #2" to "with Light Grey Bottom"?

At Tue Jul 14 04:50:02 2020 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Sun Sep 13 22:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold, will come back for checking/cert

At Wed Jul 7 11:55:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
As Type 2 is used only in three sets and exclusively in Light Grey a KEYWORD with the set numbers along with some words from the set's title seams crucial to me.

https://lego.brickinstructions.com/05000/5221/003.jpg
https://lego.brickinstructions.com/08000/8279/010.jpg
https://lego.brickinstructions.com/08000/8307/004.jpg

At Sun Jul 18 16:35:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
This file should contain: (complete assembly of the body ) + all the moving/rotating parts (switches and axles).

The (complete assembly of the body) should contain: (an assembly of the body) + the battery lid.

An (assembly of the body) should contain: Top body(32288) + Base part(32289b) + the added small parts (u9518+u9519) + the screws


At Sun Jul 18 16:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-24021-post-41972.html#pid41972

At Wed Jul 21 14:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Jul 21 14:55:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I missed this. u9519 is to big. Collision with a pin.

1 14 0 92 47 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 u9519.dat
1 1 40 82 40 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3749.dat
At Wed Jul 21 22:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Are the colours correct?
The third axle used to be grey when it was included in the bottom part.

Could you please consider making a file containing all the static parts, like in my suggestion?

At Wed Jul 21 22:20:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Jul 24 14:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe some screws, like these:
1 4 -11.5 94 47 -.8 0 0 0 -.6 0 0 0 .8 u9013.dat
Here are some images:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/265213450110?epid=149152094&hash=item3dbff4177e:g:IgsAAOSwIAxffwoD

At Sat Jul 24 14:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Do we know why this motor is called 3142c01 at Bricklink ?

At Sat Jul 24 20:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: kuramapika1
Certification: novote
Comments:
Abaout part u9013.dat: there is a problem with part 32288.dat; it have a surface on the bottom where the screw goes that collide with part u9013.dat.
It's safe to use part u9013.dat, with proper adjustement, on this part?
Speaking on the name in Bricklink: how knows?

At Wed Aug 25 11:55:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Thu Sep 30 16:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Missing some screws.

At Mon Oct 4 20:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Comments:
Added part u9013.dat.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Oct 4 21:00:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Missing colour on all the screws, code 494

At Mon Oct 4 21:35:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Comments:
Fixed.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Oct 5 10:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Oct 5 10:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Oct 5 10:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
u9510 and u9511 is 79 - Milky White

At Tue Oct 5 18:35:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: kuramapika1
Comments:
Fixed.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Oct 5 19:45:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Oct 5 20:45:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I still think we should make one file containing all the static body parts, and then add all the moving parts, in this file.

At Wed Oct 6 19:10:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.