Unofficial File parts/x580.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Electric Train Motor  4 x 12 x  4 Base
0 Name: x580.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CW

0 !HISTORY 2004-07-01 [mikeheide] Made BFC compliant
0 !HISTORY 2004-07-09 [mikeheide] some minor changes
0 !HISTORY 2004-07-23 [mikeheide] BFC CW added
0 !HISTORY 2007-09-21 [mikeheide] corrected bad vertex sequence
0 !HISTORY 2012-04-07 [Steffen]   repaired geometry, removed T junctions, used stugs

Status:
Needs more votes. (CN)
Size: 10007 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
fwcain=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Electric Train Motor 4.5V 4 x 12 x 4
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSN)
Electric Train Motor 4.5V 4 x 12 x 4 with Black Base
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Electric Train Motor 4.5V 4 x 12 x 4 Patterned
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Electric Train Motor 4.5V 4 x 12 x 4 Patterned, Black Base
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jun 26 19:00:06 2004, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide proxy=cwdee
At Wed Jul 7 19:26:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Improved Version

At Fri Jul 9 22:42:03 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
At Fri Jul 23 19:42:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
At Fri Sep 21 07:34:05 2007, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Bad vertex sequence line 29
Could be improved with an edgeline at the junction between ribs and stud4 on bottom side

At Fri Sep 21 15:56:03 2007, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Fixed bad sequenz

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Sep 21 17:34:06 2007, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon May 25 19:38:02 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
is the superfluous/stray "CLIP" in the BFC statement
present by intention?

At Mon May 25 19:44:12 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
BFC certification statement contains superfluous CLIP

At Mon May 25 20:24:03 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Deleted CLIP from BFC statement.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon May 25 20:30:06 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
just wanted to vote "certify", but then I found missing edges
on the underside where the ribs contact the underside studs

At Sun Feb 7 17:46:19 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Added edgelines.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Oct 27 17:50:02 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
IMHO, the origin needs correction

At Sun Jul 3 22:30:04 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Please reconsider your hold vote. This is only used in the mentioned parts. So it should match to counterparts not to some standards.

At Mon Jul 4 00:00:05 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold.
However, I still think that this - as a part, not subpart,
sitting in the PARTS, not PARTS\S folder -
should follow our usual origin habits.
However, this opinion is not shared by everybody

At Mon Jul 4 00:45:05 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I just looked at this file in more detail again.
- I don't understand the comment
"0 // Part consists of two subparts because different color"
, this is probably a relict comment
- The origin is so far away from the part, and not even
within its bounding box, that I really have trouble
letting this get out. However, I seem to be outvoted here
with the argument "only the parent files use it, so no
generic origin is needed".

At Wed Mar 21 00:55:13 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
Found a too small 4-4ndis plus stray 4-4edge poking into the 2 vertical cylinders. Repaired that.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Mar 21 19:15:39 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Since you corrected the t-junctions on the top surface, could you please correct the same on the surface below.
There are two overlapping quads there, one on the side surface.

At Sat Apr 7 09:45:09 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
removed T junctions, used stugs

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Apr 9 07:35:41 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
retitled

At Wed May 1 02:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.