Unofficial File parts/x508.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Train Coupling Hook Type 2
0 Name: x508.dat
0 Author: Niels Karsdorp [nielsk]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2012-04-21 [Steffen] changed orientation and origin, shortened by 1 LDU
0 !HISTORY 2017-09-07 [GeraldLasser] complete rework

0 // Hook
Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Size: 2420 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Train Coupling Hook Common Base Half
Status: Needs more votes. (CN)
~Train Coupling Hook Common Parts
Status: Needs more votes. (CN)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Nov 8 09:34:06 2004, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: nielsk
Comments:
Needs work: Curved end of hook.

At Mon Nov 8 17:42:01 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I suggest prepending all comments with

0 // ....

such that we lateron will have more freedom in extending the file format.

At Thu Dec 28 09:12:04 2006, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Oct 22 09:30:10 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
let's cleanup the header

0 KEYWORDS your keywords
At Thu Jun 2 13:30:06 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
- header needs cleanup
- typo "indeen" -> "indeed" in header
- when reorienting x507.dat, this should also get reoriented
- should we create a shortcut of this plus plate?

At Sat Apr 21 10:55:06 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
changed orientation and origin
there are still errors present in this file
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Apr 21 11:55:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
two small triangular gaps are present
on both sides of the hook at the top of this box
1 14 0 -4.735 -21.5 0 0 2 4.735 0 0 0 8 0 box3u2p.dat

edges missing at the bottom of
1 14 0 -13.5 -4.5 4.5 0 0 0 0 4.5 0 -8.5 0 2-4cyli.dat

I feel also some more edges missing.

something to check: this cylinder
1 14 0 0 0 4.5 0 0 0 -13.5 0 0 0 4.5 2-4cyli.dat
is modeled thicker than in the type 1 hook.
This leads to the (ugly) effect that in the 737c01.dat assembly
the hook needs to be positioned differently than in the 737c03.dat
assembly. Do these cylinders _really_ have a different diameter?
At Sat Apr 21 13:40:25 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
added license, corrected typo

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Apr 21 13:40:25 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
restoring hold

At Sat Apr 21 18:20:06 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
shortened hook by 1 LDU to make this assembly possible:
1 9 -50 0 -60 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3008.dat
1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 737c02.dat
1 47 0 0 -120 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 737.dat
1 10 80 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 737c04.dat
1 47 80 0 -120 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 737.dat
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Apr 21 18:20:07 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
restoring hold, gaps are still present:

on both sides of the hook at the top of this box
1 14 0 -4.735 -21.5 0 0 2 4.735 0 0 0 8 0 box3u2p.dat

At Mon Apr 23 16:30:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is it missing edge lines where the reinforcement on top, meets the cylinders?
If it is glued, is it a part or a shortcut?

At Fri Jun 16 14:00:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: hold
Comments:
the top ridge is too high, part won't fit into the 12 LDU hole. I am currently redoing all of the hooks

At Wed Sep 6 21:55:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Sep 7 16:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The description is missing.

At Thu Sep 7 21:15:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
I also updated the header as during the process I removed the historic information. It is back now.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Sep 11 21:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Should this one be renumbered to 508c ?

At Wed Sep 13 18:20:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Unnecessary primitives inside the joint.
Think it should be renumberd.