Unofficial File parts/u9373.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Electric Technic Motor Back with Centre Pin Hole
0 Name: u9373.dat
0 Author: Chris Dee [cwdee]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS 4.5V, 12V, Stator

0 !HISTORY 2000-09-30 [PTadmin] Official Update 2000-02
0 !HISTORY 2007-09-10 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2013-04-09 [MagFors] bfc'd, removed t-junctions
0 !HISTORY 2018-03-31 [MagFors] subfiled for parts with/without centre hole

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 1540 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
~Moved to u9373
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSF)
Electric Technic Motor with Centre Pin Hole - Body Assembly
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Apr 26 19:20:07 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Sat Apr 27 10:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
should get converted from a subpart to a ~part

At Sat Apr 27 10:55:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
downgrading to novote.

can we get rid of the "4.5V" in the title?
I would like to use this file from the 12V motor as well.

At Sat Apr 27 12:15:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
If this should become a part, then it should be "closed" that there is no red area visible or it should marked with "needs work" for the moment.
If this can also be used in the 12V version, the qualifier 4.5V should get away or extended to "4.5V and 12V"

At Sun Apr 28 09:35:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I could make a fake inside to close the part, but I have no idea of how it looks. Pictures?

Would it be OK to adjust both files to this line?
1 14 0 26 40 22.627417 0 22.627417 -23.334524 0 23.334524 0 1 0 48/1-4edge.dat
1 14 0 26 40 -22.627417 0 -22.627417 23.334524 0 -23.334524 0 1 0 48/1-4edge.dat
2 14 22.627417 2.665476 40 -22.627417 2.665476 40
2 14 22.627417 49.334524 40 -22.627417 49.334524 40
If so, I could use more primitives.

Would it be OK to make the inside of the casing with lo-res primitives?

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Apr 28 09:50:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I could make a fake inside to close the part, but I have no idea of how it looks. Pictures?

Concerning to the fake inside: Yes, this was my thought, but I do not own this part. So I can't help you here :-(

Concerning to use the edge prims: Is there a reaseon for moving the top and the bottom, here? If the edges would be scaled, we could deal with the "original" dimensions of this file.
But it would be the best to get an old non-working part for doing the work with it.
And I would prefer high-res here.

At Sun Apr 28 19:25:10 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't think faking an inside is necessary.
It can be added later if somebody knows it and wants to add it IMHO.

At Sun Apr 28 21:00:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes of course, so a needs work would be fine here.

At Sat May 4 13:05:15 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
needs conversion to a ~part

At Sat Mar 31 09:47:39 2018 part 'parts/s/6216mb.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u9373.dat'.
At Sat Mar 31 09:55:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold

At Sat Mar 31 12:20:01 2018 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Sat Mar 31 16:25:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:

I think the subfile could be used in both u9373 and u9376.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Apr 3 16:50:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
can we rename this to simply "back" instead of "core"?

At Tue Apr 3 17:00:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Made a text area.
Changed "Core" to "Back"

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Apr 4 20:45:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Removed the unwanted text area.

At Wed Apr 4 20:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Should I move the vision blocker and the contact plates to the body assembly?

At Sat Dec 29 13:25:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.