Unofficial File parts/u8019.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Mursten Window  1 x  2 x  2
0 Name: u8019.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CW

0 !CATEGORY Window
0 !KEYWORDS Automatic Binding Brick

0 BFC INVERTNEXT
Status:
Certified! (ACCX)
Size: 2239 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Jan 16 02:28:03 2008, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
At Sat Jan 15 19:25:02 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Jan 15 19:45:08 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
revoking CERT.
checkout http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=1230

this shows variants a-g of which many have a totally different
main geometry. can all these have the common number 1230 ??

At Sun Jan 16 08:50:03 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
increasing to hold. check 3001ma.dat to see how the numbering issue was solved there.

At Thu May 10 09:24:49 2012 part 'parts/1230f.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u8019.dat'.
At Fri May 11 00:20:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold

At Thu Nov 1 21:20:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
has an unnecessary quad overlap at the top surface

At Sat Dec 31 11:45:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
fixed overlapping quads
removed redundant keywords
future todo: this file has still many T junctions

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Apr 11 07:30:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
Comments:
An old school part!

At Sat Jun 8 23:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
for me this part is good to go in this iteration.
striving for 100% perfectness can hold up releases forever.
T junctions can be removed in a subsequent iteration IMHO.

At Fri Jul 19 08:03:51 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.