Unofficial File parts/u8009b.dat
File Header:
0 Mursten Brick 4 x 4 Corner with 1 Slot Right
0 Name: u8009b.dat
0 Author: N. W. Perry [Plastikean]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Brick
0 !KEYWORDS Automatic Binding Brick, Lego Mursten
0 !HISTORY 2022-03-27 [MagFors] Studs without logo
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 1256 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Needs more votes. (N)Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Jun 24 15:50:02 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Not sure "left" or "right" are the best qualifiers, but I have nothing better to offer...
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Not sure "left" or "right" are the best qualifiers, but I have nothing better to offer...
At Sun Jun 27 12:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Plastikean
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed. This was done to match nomenclature of existing slotted parts, but it is fairly arbitrary.
Reviewer: Plastikean
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed. This was done to match nomenclature of existing slotted parts, but it is fairly arbitrary.
At Mon Jul 26 22:20:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Using only rect.dat primitives creates lots of duplicated edge lines.
Obvious T-junctions that could be avoided.
Is it correct to use the regular stud.dat here? It will generate a logo on studs.
Maybe use stud26 instead?
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Using only rect.dat primitives creates lots of duplicated edge lines.
Obvious T-junctions that could be avoided.
Is it correct to use the regular stud.dat here? It will generate a logo on studs.
Maybe use stud26 instead?
At Tue Jul 27 06:35:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Plastikean
Certification: novote
Comments:
Slotted bricks such as these would not have had stud logos, no. And along with the geometry concerns, it would seem in order to revise the whole range of Mursten-era parts, as I did not attempt to make any improvements to those.
Reviewer: Plastikean
Certification: novote
Comments:
Slotted bricks such as these would not have had stud logos, no. And along with the geometry concerns, it would seem in order to revise the whole range of Mursten-era parts, as I did not attempt to make any improvements to those.
At Sun Mar 27 08:25:01 2022, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Studs without logo
Removed T-junctions
Made CCW
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Studs without logo
Removed T-junctions
Made CCW
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Apr 21 19:35:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
3D View