Unofficial File parts/t1052.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~| Circuit Cubes Device Module Cover
0 Name: t1052.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Electric

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 9805 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
| Circuit Cubes LED
Status: 8 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes LED RGB
Status: 9 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Geared Motor
Status: 12 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes NO/NC Switch
Status: 12 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Momentary Switch
Status: 9 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Knife Switch (Closed)
Status: 9 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Knife Switch (Opened)
Status: 9 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Tilt Switch
Status: 9 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes High Speed Motor
Status: 12 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Buzzer
Status: 11 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSSSSSSN)
| Circuit Cubes Potentiometer
Status: 9 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSSSSSSSSN)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Apr 22 14:55:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
At Sun Sep 27 13:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Aug 7 05:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
* Overlap on both sides:

4 3 -37.071 42 37.071 -36 42 36 -36 42 -16 -37.6 42 -16
4 3 -40 42 30 -37.071 42 37.071 -37.6 42 -24 -40 42 -25

* Ugliest triangulation in the world (on both sides ;-)

4 10 -40 29.1821 14.7833 -40 26 30 -40 42 30 -40 42 -25
3 10 -40 42 -25 -40 29.5 13.127 -40 29.1821 14.7833

* This is really clever:

1 1 30 16 -30 4.6669 0 -4.6669 0 1 0 4.6669 0 4.6669 4-4ndis.dat
1 1 30 16 -30 0 0 -10 0 1 0 -10 0 0 1-4chrd.dat
4 1 30 16 -39.3338 20.6662 16 -30 20 16 -30 30 16 -40

but I wonder why you didn't simply use 3 rings:

1 16 -30 16 -30 .15 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 .15 4-4rin44.dat
1 16 -30 16 -30 .75 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 .75 4-4ring9.dat
1 16 -30 16 -30 2.5 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 2.5 4-4ring3.dat
At Sun Nov 7 16:05:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
- Corrected an overlap (but not where you mentionned?)
- Improved triangulation (believe me, I've seen worse ;) )
- Because this solution uses almost 1/3 of the surfaces to render. Moreover "simply" is a matter of taste, as it requires no ring calculations, and work for any R2/R1 ratio, provided R2>1.414*R1...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Nov 8 10:40:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
Still overlap:

4 3 -37.071 42 37.071 -36 42 36 -36 42 -16 -37.6 42 -16
4 3 -40 42 30 -37.071 42 37.071 -37.6 42 -24 -40 42 -25

Check:

2 1 -37.5376 42 -16 -37.6 42 -16

At Mon Nov 8 13:15:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Gotcha. Corrected both sides.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Nov 9 13:35:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.