Unofficial File parts/t1032c01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 | Vengit S-Brick Power Functions Bluetooth Receiver
0 Name: t1032c01.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Electric

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSN)
Size: 448 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
Steffen=novote
arezey=novote
cwdee=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~| Vengit S-Brick Power Functions Bluetooth Receiver Top
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSN)
Download: parts/t1032.dat
~| Vengit S-Brick Power Functions Bluetooth Receiver Bottom
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (SN)
Download: parts/t1033.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Jan 12 09:40:01 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
At Fri Jan 12 19:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
huh?
A leading pipe sign in the parts title?
I also don't understand the strange file name
t1032c01.dat
. Is "t" used for "third party"?
Where does the number come from?

At Fri Jan 12 20:00:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
compare to
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/u9399.dat
which uses "*" prefix

At Fri Jan 12 20:10:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as far as I can see, this is this part:
https://www.sbrick.com/sbrick
, so it is clearly 3rd party.
Why not use the standard prefix?

At Fri Jan 12 20:25:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
we currently have already the prefixes

~
_
_
*
=

, I cannot see the need for

|

We should minimize them to an understandable amount

At Fri Jan 12 21:35:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think that we should replace "*" with "|" for all third party parts, because "|" is lexicographically greater than letters, while "*" is lesser, so third-party prefixes would get sorted properly.

At Fri Jan 12 22:45:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Please see here, for explanation and justification - https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-21776.html

At Fri Jan 12 23:10:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks like a closed thread. I'm not able to read it. Was that intended?

At Fri Jan 12 23:35:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I also cannot read it. Read protection.

At Sat Jan 13 06:05:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Sorry, my mistake - we'll make a public announcement soon. Basically, third party parts aimed at the AFOL user will be allowed in the LDraw library, named tNNNN.dat. Their descriptions will start with '| <manufacturer> ...', so ensure they sort after regular parts.

At Sat Jan 13 11:00:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Question:
I like that.
BUT: Will that decision _replace_ the existing parts which use "*" as prefix instead of "|"? There should not be 2 separate prefixes IMHO.
We should decide for _one_ please.
I'm fine with either * or |,
I am just complaining that currently _both_ are in use.

At Sat Jan 13 12:00:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
suddenly I don't find the "*" prefix anymore on the PT.
have they silently been replaced by "|" by Admin maybe?
that would explain my confusion

At Sat Jan 13 12:30:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, admin edit are kind of silent... * was changed to | on all files.

At Sat Jan 13 12:40:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think that such silent background edits
without history entry are completely evil and confusing... :'(

At Sat Jan 13 12:40:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
if at each changed file a history entry
"replaced * prefix by | via admin edit"
would have been present, everything would have been clear

At Sat Jan 13 12:40:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
(I mean PT history log, not !HISTORY in the file)