Unofficial File parts/s/70181s00.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Spring Extension 18 x  3.5mm - Main Piece
0 Name: s\70181s00.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2010-12-29 [MagFors] Created with MLCad Spring Generator
0 !HISTORY 2019-03-06 [MagFors] Added conditional lines

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 37181 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify
Philo=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Spring Extension 18 x 3.5mm
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)
Download: parts/70181.dat
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Oct 8 18:45:05 2011, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Wed Oct 12 16:15:10 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Added "Pull" to partname.

At Thu Feb 2 20:10:04 2012 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Fri Feb 17 19:40:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
There's a lot of duplicated lines (and a few limit warped quads but I don't think it matters much at this scale).

At Fri Feb 17 20:20:05 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Cleaned with DatHeader.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Feb 17 20:55:03 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Datheader introduced some condlines in a file that (like all springs) contains none...

At Fri Feb 17 21:45:06 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Uncleaned, not useing DatHeader...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Feb 17 22:10:08 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Corrected name.

At Sat Feb 18 06:55:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Feb 18 07:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Line 17: Coplanarity. 4 16 3.75 -0.22 0 3.46 -0.2 1.44 3.26 0.03 1.35 3.52 0 0
Line 250: Coplanarity. 4 16 3.26 0.87 -1.35 3.52 0.9 0 3.75 1.12 0 3.46 1.1 -1.44
Line 256: Coplanarity. 4 16 3.75 0.68 0 3.46 0.7 1.44 3.26 0.93 1.35 3.52 0.9 0
Line 362: Coplanarity. 4 16 3.26 1.32 -1.35 3.52 1.35 0 3.75 1.57 0 3.46 1.55 -1.44

At Sat Feb 18 08:50:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Most sprigs have warped quads, I think we can live with that...

At Sat Feb 18 14:05:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Corrected, since the angle of the four mentioned quads were above commonly accepted 3 degrees.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Sep 9 16:35:09 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
All condlines are missing

At Mon Sep 9 21:40:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Springs never do.
See the comment from Philo above.
At Mon Sep 9 21:50:10 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Do we have a physical or logical reason for this?

At Mon Sep 9 22:10:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Mainly filesize, but also the fact that it is such a small part.
It was initially made using only torus primitives, but was then heavily reduced.
Have a look at it in the assembly, 46564.

At Mon Sep 9 22:45:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Well, indeed there it is modelled the same way.
But take a look to 519 or 519c01, there it is modeled with tori.
For sure, I'm fine with the spring generator of MLCad. But IMHO the generated files should also get condlines. It's only a result by MLCad that there are no condlines in the generated files. Nothing else.

I'm not sure who it was, that complained about exceptions in our rules, but here I can really understand anybody, who complains this exception.
Any other opinions?

At Tue Sep 10 15:55:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'll gladly add some cond-lines if that'll get it certified.

But may I ask you to look at these first:
u9070, 987, 70450a, 70450b, 110, 108. All made by the Spring generator, without cond-lines.
IMHO, 519, and 519c01, is the exception from the rule.
At Thu Dec 21 17:40:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Updated description

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Feb 28 21:30:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
Agree with Martin. Misses conds.

At Wed Mar 6 21:30:02 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
OK, I'll surrender.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 7 20:10:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Mar 9 07:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Sorry, I jump in much too late! imho condlines are a complete waste here. Anyway this spring is not realistic as the wire is round, not square!!!