Unofficial File parts/s/6192s01.dat
File Header:
0 ~Brick 2 x 4 with Curved Top - Inside Stud Adapter
0 Name: s\6192s01.dat
0 Author: Max Martin Richter [MMR1988]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 !HELP Height = 2.471886 LDU
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 803 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify Holly-Wood=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Needs more votes. (N)Related (unofficial) subfiles:
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Apr 12 09:45:00 2015, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
I tend to make this (completely or at least some areas) a new primitive.
The outside is an exact counterpart of cylj primitves. We could introduce a cylj2 - as we did for the cyls prims. Maybe we should split the old cylj prim into seperate prims for the edge and the surface?
Furthermore I have no idea on how to work with this odd height, when making this a primitve.
Any ideas or opinions are more than welcome.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
I tend to make this (completely or at least some areas) a new primitive.
The outside is an exact counterpart of cylj primitves. We could introduce a cylj2 - as we did for the cyls prims. Maybe we should split the old cylj prim into seperate prims for the edge and the surface?
Furthermore I have no idea on how to work with this odd height, when making this a primitve.
Any ideas or opinions are more than welcome.
At Sun Apr 12 15:50:00 2015, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would round height to nearest integer (3). Two benefits: easier to use, and there would be a condline at lowest height. This would give a smoother result with stud cylinder.
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would round height to nearest integer (3). Two benefits: easier to use, and there would be a condline at lowest height. This would give a smoother result with stud cylinder.
At Sun Apr 12 16:40:00 2015, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I like that. 3 is a lot better that 2.471886
I would prefer a half stud4 primitive. I think it would be more useful.
2-4stud4r16, a half understud with edgeline at radius 16.
Or could that be reduced down to a scalable 1-4cyls-primitive
with an edge line fitting a cylinder, instead of a slope?
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I like that. 3 is a lot better that 2.471886
I would prefer a half stud4 primitive. I think it would be more useful.
2-4stud4r16, a half understud with edgeline at radius 16.
Or could that be reduced down to a scalable 1-4cyls-primitive
with an edge line fitting a cylinder, instead of a slope?
At Wed May 6 20:35:00 2015, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I've had a second look at this idea.
I now prefer the cylj2. It would be a good complement to the ordinary cyl joiner.
And yes, I want the edge line included.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I've had a second look at this idea.
I now prefer the cylj2. It would be a good complement to the ordinary cyl joiner.
And yes, I want the edge line included.
At Wed May 6 21:35:00 2015, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
It's still in my mind, that I have to do something here.
I prefer the cylj2 version as well.
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
It's still in my mind, that I have to do something here.
I prefer the cylj2 version as well.
At Thu Nov 12 18:45:00 2015, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Used new primitive...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Used new primitive...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Jun 25 20:05:00 2017, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Mon May 11 11:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
3D View