Unofficial File parts/s/33299s01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Technic Beam  3 x  0.5 Liftarm with Boss and Pin Common
0 Name: s\33299s01.dat
0 Author: Orion Pobursky [OrionP]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2004-10-31 [guyvivan] Made BFC compliant
0 !HISTORY 2009-05-02 [PTadmin] Official Update 2009-01
0 !HISTORY 2013-06-01 [arezey] Subfiled from 33299.dat, fixed bleed-ins at the boss axlehole and pin

Status:
Needs admin review. (CCN)
Size: 11621 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Technic Beam 3 x 0.5 Liftarm with Boss and Pin
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Technic Beam 3 x 0.5 Liftarm with Boss and Pin Semi-Reduced
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSN)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jun 1 21:20:04 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
Common geometry subfiled from 33299.dat. I fixed some bleed-ins while at it, though there's still the extra edgelines.. these are caused by the npeghol2.dat! What's the plan here, inline it?

At Mon Jun 3 16:50:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, I think you should inline that primitive.

Is it also missing two edge lines, inside the cavity, behind the pin?
At Fri Jul 1 09:40:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Removed extraneous edge lines

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Jul 4 20:30:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing edge lines here:
2 14 -6 0 36.662 -6 10 36.662
2 14 6 10 36.662 6 0 36.662
Or should it be cond-lines?

At Tue Jul 5 09:20:01 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Seems to need edge lines. Also fixed some bleeding in that area.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jul 5 20:15:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon Sep 26 20:50:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.