Unofficial File parts/s/32004s01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Wheel Rim 18 x 41 Model Team - Common Geometry
0 Name: s\32004s01.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
3 subfiles aren't certified. (SSSN)
Size: 6395 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=novote
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
Plastikean=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Technic Axle Hole Tooth
Status: Needs admin review. (CCF)
Download: p/axlehol6.dat
Technic Axle Hole Sides
Status: Needs more votes. (CF)
Download: p/axlehol7.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Wheel Rim 18 x 41 Model Team Type 1
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSN)
Wheel Rim 18 x 41 Model Team Type 2
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSF)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Mar 15 21:30:02 2021, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
At Tue Mar 16 09:20:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't understand usage of axlehol7.dat. It make the hole needlessly complex, would better use cyli+quads...

At Sat Apr 17 16:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I find a cross section of this part very strange.
Is it correct that this is a flat surface? Only based on few images, but I think it is a conical surface.
1 12 0 0 12 45 0 0 0 0 45 0 -1 0 4-4disc.dat

And I think the tip of the spokes are to narrow.
0 !LPE DISTANCE 5 6.97854 -44.39611 12 -6.97904 -44.39754 12

https://www.steinpalast.eu/media/image/5f/3c/a2/15355.jpg
http://media.peeron.com/pics/inv/custpics/32004a.1119203367.jpg

At Mon Apr 19 20:55:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't have this part.

I did the second version based on the forum request.

I took the existing part, which was very detailed, and based on them I re-did them keeping the existing geometry.

NWPerry got them?

At Mon Apr 19 21:20:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
A cross section of the very similar rim 32020 makes more sense.

At Tue Apr 20 05:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Plastikean
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't have the part either, I'm afraid. When I attempted this part I didn't have the good idea to subfile both the existing and the new part, and I didn't notice the conical profile either. Although now that it's been pointed out, I agree it makes sense.

At Tue Apr 20 10:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I have got the 32020, agreed the two share pretty much the same geometry. Unfortunately their origin is not the same, that a pity.

I will add the conical surface to the other side as well. Actually it is pretty logical that this surface must be conical, as the amount of ABS would be too much for a proper cooling, leaving sunken marks.

this gets on my to do list...
At Tue Apr 20 10:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
it feels like opening a can of wormss when you touch and rework an existing part :-)

At Tue Apr 20 14:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Plastikean
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can't help but feel partly responsible. :-)