Unofficial File parts/s/30625s01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Hinge Panel  1 x  4 x  3.667 Locking with  6 Holes - Half
0 Name: s\30625s01.dat
0 Author: Evert-Jan Boer [ejboer]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 13657 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Hinge Panel 1 x 4 x 3.667 Locking with 6 Holes
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSX)
Download: parts/30625.dat
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Jan 29 20:25:01 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: ejboer
Comments:
Needs work, see comment in file. I think this part is usable in it's current state, will continue to work on it.
Can have more rect/box primitives also.

At Mon Jan 30 13:00:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: ejboer
Comments:
Changed click hinge, changed origin, some corrections and checked for missing lines/condlines.

At Mon Jan 30 13:35:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Thanks for the origin change!
Looking in more details.... why did you use 48 primitives for pin holes (and around pin holes)? Remember that the number of facets to render IS important, and should be kept at the minimum insuring a "correct" look (OK, "correct" depends on user ;) ). At that scale, 16 primitive is more than enough, and 48 are not in line with other similar parts. LDraw library primary purpose is model documentation, not to get ultra-fancy computer renderings. There are other related libraries for that (LGEO). Even with 48 primitives, the raw ldraw part is still missing all the little bevels here and there that makes photorealistic image...

At Mon Jan 30 14:00:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: ejboer
Certification: novote
Comments:
Will have a look at lowering the primitive resolution, point taken on the general use of high vs low resolution, will keep in mind for future parts.

At Tue Jan 31 11:00:01 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: ejboer
Comments:
Reduced resolution for pin holes.

DATHeader still gives me two errors, but no indication what these are:
30625s01.dat
Filesize: 16.845 byte - Errors found: 2
header and body tests are all OK.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jan 31 12:20:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
DH result is mysterious indeed... Part looks very good!

At Mon Feb 6 16:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Note: it is best to leave middle elements in the main part, instead of cutting them (less surfaces to render).

At Sun Feb 19 18:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing edges at the bottom.
I dislike the practice of cutting primitives in halves.
Please, place any primitives, quads or edges across the cutting plane, in the main file.

At Mon Feb 20 09:00:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: ejboer
Certification: novote
Comments:
Missing edges: http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=6472610
If referring to the indicated areas in the screenshot, these are conditional lines. Was in doubt if they should be normal lines or conditional.
At Wed Feb 22 18:55:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I missed that... when there is a clear angle break, then an edge line must be used. condlines go only in completely smooth areas.

At Fri Jul 7 17:30:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: ejboer
Comments:
Reworked design, moved split quads, triangles and primitives to mainfile

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Jul 9 22:35:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.