Unofficial File parts/s/3010p24s01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Mail Horn Pattern
0 Name: s\3010p24s01.dat
0 Author: Ulrich Röder [UR]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // Main

Status:
Needs admin review. (CCX)
Size: 2089 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Brick 1 x 4 with Red Mail Horn Pattern - Left-Aligned
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)
Brick 1 x 4 with Red Mail Horn Pattern - Right-Aligned
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Nov 14 05:25:01 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: UR

At Thu Nov 15 02:40:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
the word "Subpart" should be removed from the title IMHO:
we usually do not put that there, see
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptlist.cgi?sort=type

At Thu Nov 15 08:20:02 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Sun Nov 18 17:50:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


At Mon May 27 22:35:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Darats
Comments:
Removed duplicated lines

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Tue May 28 11:30:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
... out of interest ...

... where should there have been double lines please?

... still have all the original files here ... neither DatHeader nor LDPE show something ... in this regard.


At Tue May 28 11:50:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Darats
Certification: novote
Comments:
I was going for certification, but DATHeader did show some duplicated empty lines. Nothing really important indeed. Feel free to resubmit previous version if you prefer, I didn't meant to bother anyone.


At Tue May 28 12:25:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
You didn't bother me in any kind...everything is fine...darats...it is as i said...out of interest..

I just checked all those belonging files ( ...those I have still here on my PC ) again a second time ..and DatHeader declares zero mistakes.

Therefore, I can not understand that it showed you another result ....

especially ... Magnus would have cleared this under warranty immediately ... I'm sure ... because he always uses datheader ....

... that's why I just do not understand that ...a strange phenomenon..

Do you remember where that double line was ... that you were shown?


At Tue May 28 13:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Darats
Certification: novote
Comments:
As I'm not an english native, I didn't really get the meaning of "out of interest". Anyway, no problem.

As far as I remember: the doubles lines where for sure in the parts using this subpart, but I'm pretty sure there were more than one emplty line between the CCW statement and the begining of the geometry definition. Also, I've added the final empty line (as it has been discussed in another part on the tracker).

Also, be aware that DATHeader doesn't give an error if there is duplicated lines, it only ask if you want to remove them when checking for errors.


At Tue May 28 14:15:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
.. also after the third error check ... there is nothing.
I can not follow you .... concerning the "double lines"

.... the free lines between the header and the code ... you will find in all my parts of the first months I'm working here ...
which is not a real problem..or even a disadvantage would have ...

as well as the empty line at the end ... nobody does that yet .... what I see so far.
The moderator wished in this regard to postpone the "discussion" in the forum ...

Wouldn't it be a good occasion that you open a thread about it ...?


At Tue May 28 15:50:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Darats
Certification: novote
Comments:
Lets forget about all of this, lets get those parts certified...
I think DATHeader detects 2 empty lines as a duplicate empty line, and so remove it. It is indeed not a problem at all, otherwise I would have hold the part.

I dont really want to open discussion on this on the forum. Encens I submit parts for some years now, Im quite new on reviewing. Maybe I shouldnt had done that.


At Tue May 28 17:10:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

Datheader will help you to format your file so that it is correct.
Some of the changes it does is not an error, and doesn't report it as Error or Warning.

Many empty lines, e.g. between the header and the first line of code, will be corrected silently
so that a single empty line remains.

If you have two, or more, empty lines at the end of the file, Datheader will report this as
"Too much empty lines at the end of the file."

If you open your old files in Datheader and do a review, and hit Save after a "clean review", it will
automagically format your file so that it looks good and is better to read for the human eye.

Datheader will also silently re-arrange all the different sections in the header, and add empty lines
between the sections, if you forget to do that.
The order should allways be: Help - BFC - Category - Keyword - Cmdline - History

It is always a good idea to, at least once, hit Save in Datheader and give your file a correct format.





At Tue May 28 17:40:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
very nice .... finally a precise explanation .... thank you for that Magnus ...

You already had certified .... and you are always very precise with everything ....
so that was not plausible to me at first ...

because Darats has already made this procedure with all files ... I assume ... that I do not have to submit them again ... and the files can be certified.


At Tue May 28 19:30:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would prefer if the subpart is centered at X/Y/Z = 0/0/0.


At Fri May 31 12:50:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Darats
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ulrich, as you are the author, maybe you wanna take care of this, let me know.


At Fri May 31 15:15:02 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Sun Jun 9 07:20:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


At Sun Jun 9 08:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
1 BFC error in the horn


At Sun Jun 9 08:30:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes...


At Sun Jun 9 10:40:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Comments:
corrected...THX

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Sun Jun 9 11:10:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


At Sun Jun 9 11:25:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.