Unofficial File parts/s/2551s01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Boat  5 x 14 x  2 Half Side
0 Name: s\2551s01.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CW

0 !HISTORY 2007-08-25 {LEGO Universe Team} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2007-10-17 [tchang] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-06 [Philo] Miscellaneous improvements, added clapboard to sides
0 !HISTORY 2018-06-04 [Philo] Modified for 21301 variant

Status:
1 'hold' vote. (HN)
Size: 217323 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=hold
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Boat 5 x 14 x 2 without Front Side Bar Holders
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (SN)
Download: parts/21301.dat
Boat 5 x 14 x 2 with Front Side Bar Holders
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (SN)
Download: parts/2551.dat
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Oct 19 03:58:02 2007, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
At Fri Oct 19 08:52:01 2007, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
could make usage of rects, rings, cylinders

At Fri Jan 14 01:00:05 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
type in header is wrong: this is not a part but a subpart

At Fri Jan 14 20:50:02 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold after Admin edit corrected header

At Sat Feb 26 15:55:10 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
leading ~ is missing in title

At Sat Feb 26 22:10:03 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Fixed title and many coplanarity errors

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 10 08:45:03 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Brickaneer
Certification: hold
Comments:
Some edge lines are missing.
See westrate's post in part 2551 mentioned the clapboard. They are clearly visible. I think it's not really difficult to design: Adjusting the upper edges of the faces a few in x direction and closing the gaps with horizontally faces and new edge lines.

At Sun Mar 10 18:26:59 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Edgelines missing at following positions:
1) hollow stud inside and outside at bottom
2) If you look from underside/side you see missing edgeline along the round border.
3) looking from side/front you see missing edgelines at the "nose".

Wrong edgelines can be seen at the inside back and at the inside in the middle in front.

At Thu Mar 6 09:30:07 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Added missing edge lines, removed a few parasitic ones, created side clapboards, used stud primitive for front stud.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Mar 16 10:00:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
One small triangle is bfc inverse, in the new clapboard.
Missing an edge line inside the rear clip.
Missing cond-lines below the oarlocks.

At Sun Nov 2 21:15:01 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I also spotted the BFC inverse small triangle,
and spotted the missing condlines in the oar locks.

I could not find the mentioned missing edgeline,
but spotted a stray condline in the rear connector.

At Fri Nov 25 13:40:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Hopefully solved all mentionned issues.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Dec 5 17:00:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I was thinking on this line
5 4 3.5 -20.97 112.07 3.5 -28.97 112.07 3.5 -21.42 113.91 3.91 -28.96 110.83
IMO it should be an edgeline.

At Tue Dec 6 10:40:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Yeah, better...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Dec 6 17:25:01 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Looks like that edge got added twice...

At Tue Dec 6 18:35:01 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Oops...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Dec 6 19:25:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Dec 27 22:20:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon Jun 4 14:40:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Sep 16 18:55:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Sirio
Certification: hold
Comments:
Change the quad (40.23 0 99.75 0 0 99.75 0 -25 99.75 42.02 -20.35 99.75) with the triangle (40.23 0 99.75 0 -25 99.75 42.02 -20.35 99.75) and a triangle in the main part (40.23 0 99.75 0 -25 99.75 40.23 0 99.75), so as not to have a junction on the centerline with a T-junction with the horizontal plane.

You could change the two vertical quads (42.85 16 98.75 36.25 16 99.5 36.25 16 -56.3 42.85 16 -60) (45.6 -3.99 -17.3 45.65 -16.02 -16.3 45.65 -16.02 98.75 45.6 -3.99 98.75) on the side face to avoid T-junctions, especially the upper one near the oarlock.

At Mon Dec 9 08:10:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
I always prefer a T-junction (if it has no visual impact) if it can save a bunch of triangles... but here it was the opposite! Made some simplifications...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Dec 10 18:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Sirio
Certification: novote
Comments:
3 conditional lines remained no longer useful (duplicated planes) at the lines 2126, 2378, 2436.

At Wed Dec 11 11:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
invisible condlines:

5 24 30.902 -22.52 99.75 30.905 -23.52 100.21 20.66 -24.96 100.03 41.66 -21.37 100.1
5 24 30.902 -22.52 99.75 0 -25 99.75 42.02 -20.35 99.75 20.661 -23.96 99.75
5 24 43.58 7.551 -38.1 43.2 11.06 -60 42.85 16 -60 43.55 6.121 -60.1

At Wed Dec 11 13:20:02 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
This bothers me... depending on circumstancies, LDPE reports these errors or not, and I can't reproduce reliably to report to Nils.
Anyway... fixed this and split warped quads.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jan 21 20:45:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Sirio
Certification: certify
Comments:
Missing conditional lines (hold reason)
5 24 43.58 7.551 -38.1 42.85 16 -60 43.55 8.045 98.75 43.2 11.06 -60
5 24 44.58 7.551 -39.1 44.62 -4.5 -38.1 44.55 6.121 -61.1 44.6 -3.99 -16.3
5 24 43.2 11.06 -60 42.85 16 -60 42.64 13.322 -67.4 43.58 7.551 -38.1
5 24 41.66 -21.37 100.1 42.02 -20.35 99.75 42.12 -21.46 99.869 30.902 -22.52 99.75
5 24 30.905 -23.52 100.21 30.902 -22.52 99.75 41.11 -22.37 100.68 20.66 -24.96 100.03
5 24 41.39 -22.24 100.65 41.66 -21.37 100.1 41.11 -22.37 100.68 41.76 -22.21 100.45

You could evaluate the substitution of triangles
3 16 39.267 9.932 -82.9 41.32 13.201 -74.5 41.14 16 -73.4
3 16 41.14 16 -73.4 39.148 13.054 -81.5 39.267 9.932 -82.9
with
3 16 41.32 13.201 -74.5 39.267 9.932 -82.9 39.148 13.054 -81.5
3 16 41.32 13.201 -74.5 39.148 13.054 -81.5 41.14 16 -73.4

At Sun Feb 2 16:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Sirio
Certification: hold
Comments:
Incorrect previuos certification.
There are some errors to fix; see previous comment.

At Wed Mar 4 15:50:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Marek
Certification: novote
Comments:
Holders are in incorrect position. They suppose to be more to the front of boat. I've tried to deliver solution but model is to complex for me.

At Wed Mar 4 16:10:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Marek is right. At least if I look at these parts in LDD.
This image show the holders not inline with the stud grid
https://img.bricklink.com/ItemImage/PN/88/21301.png

At Mon Mar 23 14:00:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Removed oar holders to accomodate different positions between 2551/21301

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Mar 23 17:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Something is flickering infront of the 2x2 inside the boat, in the main parts.
I think you could add a quad here instead. And a single triangle in the main file, instead of two quads