Unofficial File parts/s/2528s01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Minifig Hat Bicorne without Front and Back
0 Name: s\2528s01.dat
0 Author: Andy Westrate [westrate]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2002-08-18 [PTadmin] Official Update 2002-04
0 !HISTORY 2007-08-28 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-07 [Philo]   Modified with WINDZ for BFC compliance. Added some lines/condlines (2008-05-21)
0 !HISTORY 2011-10-16 [MagFors] Reworked top groove
0 !HISTORY 2011-12-29 [PTadmin] Official Update 2011-02
0 !HISTORY 2018-01-27 [Steffen] fixed 2 syntax errors
0 !HISTORY 2018-04-07 [MMR1988] Added missing condlines

Status:
Needs more votes. (CF)
Size: 45749 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
UR=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Jan 28 15:30:00 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
At Wed Feb 7 20:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
bump

At Thu Mar 8 22:10:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Apr 7 10:20:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Added 6 missing condlines

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Apr 10 20:35:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Sep 15 19:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Dec 19 14:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is this the right time and opportunity to obsolete this mesh and use something from LDD?
The overall shape of the part, and size and position of the hole for the plume, is wrong.

At Sat Dec 19 15:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe... but I'm not keen of recreating the patterns.