Unofficial File parts/s/2454s02.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Brick  1 x  2 x  5 Common Geometry
0 Name: s\2454s02.dat
0 Author: Vincent Messenet [Cheenzo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 BFC INVERTNEXT
Status:
Needs more votes. (CN)
Size: 650 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Jun 10 08:05:02 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
At Tue Jul 7 11:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
Just a test HOLD to diagnose missing comments from MagFors

At Tue Jul 7 11:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Releasing my HOLD

At Tue Jul 7 12:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Bricklink state that there's three versions of 2454. With or without a hollow stud blocker, and a third version is now in production with regular hollow studs.
Why did you choose a and b?
IMO it should be a, b and c, but OTOH I can't find any images of the version without a blocker. Does it even excist?

The new version have a logo on the inside of the hollow stud, so the s02 subfile can't include a stud primitive.

The stud blocker doesn't work well in hi-res mode. It also has unvisible surfaces, hidden on the inside.
You could use 4 x 3-16ndis around the bottom surface, and 2 x 1-8chrd on the top surface, instead.

The ridges are all too small and misplaced. The older version have ridges that block a center stud, but the new version allow a center stud.
These ridges should all touch the 2, or 3, stud configuration. There is no play between the ridges and the studs.

I don't see the point of eliminating T-junctions on the inside top surface.
I don't understand why you want to "plug the hole" with a disc primitive, in the new version, when a single big quad will do.
Remember, you should reduce the number of triangles in your files.

Lots of duplicated surfaces in -as01.
Missing edges in -bs01, along the ridges and inside the studs.

Did you inform Admin about the old file? It should become a Move to-file.

At Tue Jul 14 16:15:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
Comments:
Thanks Magnus for the review. I think I addressed everything.
Also, I checked with Chris who agreed with a and b considering there is no evidence of the current official version.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Jul 30 14:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The edge around the ndis can't be added here. It is included in the hollow stud2.
And I think you should remove the top surfaces, both inner and outer.

At Fri Jul 31 11:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Jul 31 17:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
At Thu Aug 13 20:35:01 2020 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Sat Sep 5 09:40:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.