Unofficial File parts/s/2454as01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Brick  1 x  2 x  5 with Hollow Studs and Asymmetric Inner Ridges without Front Face
0 Name: s\2454as01.dat
0 Author: Vincent Messenet [Cheenzo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Size: 877 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Cheenzo=novote
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Brick 1 x 2 x 5 with Hollow Studs and Asymmetric Inner Ridges
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Download: parts/2454a.dat
Brick 1 x 2 x 5 with Hieroglyphs, Arm on Top Pattern
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Brick 1 x 2 x 5 with Stone Wall Pattern
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Brick 1 x 2 x 5 with SW Han Solo Carbonite Pattern
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Jun 10 08:05:02 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
At Tue Jul 7 12:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Bricklink state that there's three versions of 2454. With or without a hollow stud blocker, and a third version is now in production with regular hollow studs.
Why did you choose a and b?
IMO it should be a, b and c, but OTOH I can't find any images of the version without a blocker. Does it even excist?

The new version have a logo on the inside of the hollow stud, so the s02 subfile can't include a stud primitive.

The stud blocker doesn't work well in hi-res mode. It also has unvisible surfaces, hidden on the inside.
You could use 4 x 3-16ndis around the bottom surface, and 2 x 1-8chrd on the top surface, instead.

The ridges are all too small and misplaced. The older version have ridges that block a center stud, but the new version allow a center stud.
These ridges should all touch the 2, or 3, stud configuration. There is no play between the ridges and the studs.

I don't see the point of eliminating T-junctions on the inside top surface.
I don't understand why you want to "plug the hole" with a disc primitive, in the new version, when a single big quad will do.
Remember, you should reduce the number of triangles in your files.

Lots of duplicated surfaces in -as01.
Missing edges in -bs01, along the ridges and inside the studs.

Did you inform Admin about the old file? It should become a Move to-file.

At Tue Jul 14 16:15:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
Comments:
Thanks Magnus for the review. I think I addressed everything.
Also, I checked with Chris who agreed with a and b considering there is no evidence of the current official version.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Jul 30 14:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
One edge line is too long, and duplicating.

Could you please increase the ridges?
1 16 4. 4 -3.75 0 0 2.5 0 116 0 -2.25 0 -2.25 tri3a4.dat
I meassure the distance between front and back to 3mm.

The stud blockers look really nice, but they are missing edge lines, from top to bottom.

The loose edge lines could be included in different rect-prims.

At Fri Jul 31 11:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Jul 31 17:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
At Fri Jul 31 18:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
One surface is bfc inverse

At Fri Jul 31 20:55:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Jul 31 21:15:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Aug 14 07:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Cheenzo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Aug 14 17:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why do you want to subfile the top surface and studs?

At Fri Aug 14 20:05:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Cheenzo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Because Chris asked me to provide new version for part 46212 using similar studs.
I sent him this morning but he did not upload it yet.

At Sat Sep 5 09:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.