Unofficial File parts/802ap03.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Door  1 x  3 x  3 Right with Yellow Bottom Pattern
0 Name: 802ap03.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CMDLINE -c47

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSX)
Size: 397 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Steffen=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Dec 3 17:40:00 2016, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Fri Dec 30 21:35:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Dec 30 21:50:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
IMHO needs to be renumbered to 3190p03
and retitled to
"Door 1 x 3 x 3 Right with Yellow Pattern"

At Wed Dec 27 21:40:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
802.dat has been obsoletized (see there).

therefore, either this one has to as well,
or 802 has to be un-obsoletized

checkout
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptpatterns.cgi?p=802

At Sun Feb 4 12:50:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I've asked for a renumbering.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Feb 8 07:08:09 2018 part 'parts/802p03.dat' was renamed to 'parts/802ap03.dat'.
At Fri Feb 9 17:50:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
removed "with Window" from title, added !CMDLINE

At Wed Jun 19 23:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
the line
0 BFC NOCLIP
should be removed IMHO.

what would be the reason to have it?

At Fri Jul 19 02:20:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold vote following this discussion
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23501-post-32795.html?highlight=noclip#pid32795

the NOCLIP topic needs to be revisited later in future when a better programmatic solution is available