Unofficial File parts/801.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Door  1 x  3 x  3 Left with Window (Obsolete)
0 Name: 801.dat
0 Author: Arne Hackstein
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 1998-03-23 [PTadmin] Official Update 1998-03
0 !HISTORY 2007-07-23 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2014-11-21 [roland]  Auto-corrected with libfix version of LDCad 1.4
0 !HISTORY 2014-12-27 [Philo]   BFCed with Windz, plugged holes
0 !HISTORY 2016-12-03 [MagFors] Obsoleted

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSF)
Size: 722 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
(no current reviews for this file)
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Dec 23 18:00:03 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: roland

At Fri Dec 26 00:45:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
- gap at bottom
- should get bfced


At Fri Dec 26 18:40:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
How is done this part IRL, painted transparent ABS?


At Sat Dec 27 10:20:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, Paint on transparent ABS.
I remember having set 372 'Tow Truck' as a child.
The handles became more and more transparent over the years, from all the wear.

I don't remember ever having any blue or yellow doors, but this set of pictures
clearly show transparent plastic, and was the best I could find:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=526783
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Noddy/50sets/371/s05.jpg


At Sat Dec 27 10:40:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
And is it painted on both sides?


At Sat Dec 27 11:00:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, the file is very accurate. Just patch the holes with 'transparent' quads.

If it was made today, IMO it should be made uncoloured with red/blue/yellow pattern,
but I don't think we can change it like that.


At Sat Dec 27 12:40:01 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Not convinced that BFCing this partially transparent part was the best thing to do...???

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Sat Dec 27 13:50:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Good start, but we need to subfile it without the stud.
It is mirrored in the right side version. And that file, 802.dat, also needs to be BFC'd.

How many more mirrored files are there in the official library, that now are present at the PT, without its sibling?
And why can't I find that file in the Non-BFC'd list at PT Tools?


At Sat Dec 27 14:05:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Found it..


At Sat Dec 27 14:30:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I possess this part in my collection at my parent's


At Mon Feb 23 10:40:00 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
if it's painted on transparent plastic, then this version needs to be obsoletized and we need to create 801p0x versions for red, blue and yellow doors.


At Sat Dec 3 17:40:01 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Fri Jul 28 09:20:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


At Wed Dec 27 21:25:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


At Wed Dec 27 21:45:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
why have the patterned versions
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptpatterns.cgi?p=801
not been obsoletized as well?


At Wed Dec 27 22:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
If I remember right, the patterned version had been never official. So they don't need to get obsoletized.


At Wed Dec 27 22:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
increasing to hold


At Wed Dec 27 22:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
but they are supposed to be released now officially,
so there must also be an unpatterned version,
but that's obsoletized now.
that's wrong I think


At Thu Dec 28 01:55:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
we need to have an unpatterned version of this part.
801 cannot be used for that purpose for downward compatibility.
I think we need to create a 801a


At Thu Dec 28 16:15:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Wouldn't this also require that all the new patterned version of this part also need to be renumbered?


At Thu Dec 28 16:40:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
yes, I think so.
we need to do some more cleanup for systematics here.


At Sun Feb 4 08:35:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
used subfiles

Existing certification-votes were deleted.