Unofficial File parts/75542.dat
File Header:
0 =Train Track 9V Point Left Straight
0 Name: 75542.dat
0 Author: [PTadmin]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part Alias
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CW
0 // Alias of 2861c01
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (SN)
Size: 273 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Steffen=novote cwdee=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Sep 13 18:55:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
added "=" prefix to title
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
added "=" prefix to title
At Fri Sep 13 21:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
2861c01 is a number invented by LDraw. Since it has never been released could we just rename it to 75542?
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
2861c01 is a number invented by LDraw. Since it has never been released could we just rename it to 75542?
At Fri Sep 13 22:30:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
definetely, yes.
HOWEVER:
I would very much like to suggest that THEN
all the ...cXX shortcuts on page
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptreviewsummary.cgi?f=traintrack9v
get THAT number as well.
Otherwise, we would have ...c00 and ...c02, but no ...c01,
and that gap is ugly.
I suggest that we use the proper number for the part,
and then use c01, c02, c03 etc. for the shortcuts.
The same should be done with the opposite train point.
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
definetely, yes.
HOWEVER:
I would very much like to suggest that THEN
all the ...cXX shortcuts on page
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptreviewsummary.cgi?f=traintrack9v
get THAT number as well.
Otherwise, we would have ...c00 and ...c02, but no ...c01,
and that gap is ugly.
I suggest that we use the proper number for the part,
and then use c01, c02, c03 etc. for the shortcuts.
The same should be done with the opposite train point.
At Fri Sep 13 22:35:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
unfortunately, this will mean a lot of work for the poor PT admin,
especially because as well the subparts MAYBE need renumbering.
However, the end result of having a consistent numbering
IMHO is worth the effort. If I can be of any help, let me know.
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
unfortunately, this will mean a lot of work for the poor PT admin,
especially because as well the subparts MAYBE need renumbering.
However, the end result of having a consistent numbering
IMHO is worth the effort. If I can be of any help, let me know.
At Sat Jan 28 14:50:00 2017, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold
3D View