Unofficial File parts/73304.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Power Burst Stand  5 x  5 x  0.667 with  2 Studs
0 Name: 73304.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Minifig Accessory
0 !KEYWORDS Wave, Flame, Effect

0 !HISTORY 2022-06-16 {LEGO Instructions App} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2022-06-18 [MagFors] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker


Status:
Needs admin review. (CCCN)
Size: 276883 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
Philo=certify
fwcain=certify
tcobbs=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jun 18 14:50:02 2022, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Sat Jun 18 20:15:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: tcobbs
Certification: novote
Comments:
Shouldn't the name include the total size, like 3.5 x 3.5 in the similar, (but smaller) part 35032e?

At Tue Jun 21 02:10:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
You may be able to use a simple rect primitive at the top of the stud3 rather than modeling all the polygons around it.

At Tue Jun 21 08:20:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
condlines on both sides of surface above stud3 should be lines.
I tend to agree with Mark, a single rect would do the job better and simpler even though the part is transparent. Current solution creates artifacts when primitive substitution is used.

At Tue Jun 21 16:35:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
IMO, a single rect.dat is not possible here. The design is from the ldd mesh, and I think this section of the part doesn't have any sharp edges. The surface is "softened".
I could use two quads instead, like this
4 12 4.791 4.5 -6 -4.761 4.5 -6 -4 4.5 0 4 4.5 0
4 12 4.765 4.5 6 4 4.5 0 -4 4.5 0 -4.738 4.5 6
At Tue Jun 21 19:00:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I see. Then I'd rather do this:
4 16 4 4.5 -6 4 4.5 6 4.65 4.272 6 4.65 4.272 -6
4 16 4.817 3 -6 4.65 4.272 -6 4.65 4.272 6 4.817 3 6
4 16 -4.65 4.272 6 -4 4.5 6 -4 4.5 -6 -4.65 4.272 -6
4 16 -4.65 4.272 6 -4.65 4.272 -6 -4.817 3 -6 -4.817 3 6
4 16 -4 4.5 -6 -4 4.5 6 4 4.5 6 4 4.5 -6

At Tue Jun 21 19:35:01 2022, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Why not. Simplified.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Jun 22 07:10:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jun 22 16:20:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: tcobbs
Certification: novote
Comments:
I own this part, and as far as I can tell visually, the platform to which the underside stud3 is attached has sharp edges, not rounded ones like are shown here with the two chamfers and associated conditional lines. I could be wrong about that, which is why this is a novote instead of hold, but the corners certainly appear to be sharp to me. (I assume that geometry comes from the original data from the LEGO instructions app.)

At Mon Dec 5 20:20:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
Compared to pictures it looks fine to me.

At Mon Dec 5 23:05:02 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.