Unofficial File parts/73304.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Power Burst Stand  5 x  5 x  0.667 with  2 Studs
0 Name: 73304.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Minifig Accessory
0 !KEYWORDS Wave, Flame, Effect

0 !HISTORY 2022-06-16 {LEGO Instructions App} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2022-06-18 [MagFors] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker


Status:
Needs more votes. (CN)
Size: 276883 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Philo=certify
tcobbs=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jun 18 14:50:02 2022, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Sat Jun 18 20:15:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: tcobbs
Certification: novote
Comments:
Shouldn't the name include the total size, like 3.5 x 3.5 in the similar, (but smaller) part 35032e?

At Tue Jun 21 02:10:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
You may be able to use a simple rect primitive at the top of the stud3 rather than modeling all the polygons around it.

At Tue Jun 21 08:20:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
condlines on both sides of surface above stud3 should be lines.
I tend to agree with Mark, a single rect would do the job better and simpler even though the part is transparent. Current solution creates artifacts when primitive substitution is used.

At Tue Jun 21 16:35:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
IMO, a single rect.dat is not possible here. The design is from the ldd mesh, and I think this section of the part doesn't have any sharp edges. The surface is "softened".
I could use two quads instead, like this
4 12 4.791 4.5 -6 -4.761 4.5 -6 -4 4.5 0 4 4.5 0
4 12 4.765 4.5 6 4 4.5 0 -4 4.5 0 -4.738 4.5 6
At Tue Jun 21 19:00:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I see. Then I'd rather do this:
4 16 4 4.5 -6 4 4.5 6 4.65 4.272 6 4.65 4.272 -6
4 16 4.817 3 -6 4.65 4.272 -6 4.65 4.272 6 4.817 3 6
4 16 -4.65 4.272 6 -4 4.5 6 -4 4.5 -6 -4.65 4.272 -6
4 16 -4.65 4.272 6 -4.65 4.272 -6 -4.817 3 -6 -4.817 3 6
4 16 -4 4.5 -6 -4 4.5 6 4 4.5 6 4 4.5 -6

At Tue Jun 21 19:35:01 2022, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Why not. Simplified.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Jun 22 07:10:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jun 22 16:20:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: tcobbs
Certification: novote
Comments:
I own this part, and as far as I can tell visually, the platform to which the underside stud3 is attached has sharp edges, not rounded ones like are shown here with the two chamfers and associated conditional lines. I could be wrong about that, which is why this is a novote instead of hold, but the corners certainly appear to be sharp to me. (I assume that geometry comes from the original data from the LEGO instructions app.)