Unofficial File parts/73109.dat
File Header:
0 Technic Brick 1 x 2 with Plate 1 x 2
0 Name: 73109.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 // Brick Bottom
Status:
Needs more votes. (CN)
Size: 7542 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Philo=certify mkennedy=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jan 2 19:40:02 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Sat Jan 2 20:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Bottom of plate could be done cleanly with just 4 quads :( Why go with such a complicated sheme???
Wondering for bottom of the truncated stud4 efficiency: Ring primitive as you did or tang one?
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Bottom of plate could be done cleanly with just 4 quads :( Why go with such a complicated sheme???
Wondering for bottom of the truncated stud4 efficiency: Ring primitive as you did or tang one?
At Sat Jan 2 21:25:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
forgot condlines at the half stud and the pin cutout
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
forgot condlines at the half stud and the pin cutout
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Jan 2 21:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
simplified bottom of plate
Maybe we should get this kind of half stud4 as a primitive
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
simplified bottom of plate
Maybe we should get this kind of half stud4 as a primitive
At Sun Jan 3 13:40:02 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Dunno for the cut stud4. Is it used elsewhere?
Otherwise here are the 4 quads I meant ;)
4 16 6.765 12 14 5.602 12 12 -5.6023 12 12 -6.765 12 14
4 16 6.765 12 14 -6.765 12 14 -16 12 26 16 12 26
4 16 16 12 10 10 12 10 6.765 12 14 16 12 26
4 16 -6.765 12 14 -10 12 10 -16 12 10 -16 12 26
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Dunno for the cut stud4. Is it used elsewhere?
Otherwise here are the 4 quads I meant ;)
4 16 6.765 12 14 5.602 12 12 -5.6023 12 12 -6.765 12 14
4 16 6.765 12 14 -6.765 12 14 -16 12 26 16 12 26
4 16 16 12 10 10 12 10 6.765 12 14 16 12 26
4 16 -6.765 12 14 -10 12 10 -16 12 10 -16 12 26
At Thu Jan 7 05:45:02 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why the use of the ring primitives?
Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why the use of the ring primitives?
3D View