Unofficial File parts/73109.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Brick  1 x  2 with Plate  1 x  2
0 Name: 73109.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // Brick Bottom
Status:
Needs more votes. (CN)
Size: 7542 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Philo=certify
mkennedy=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jan 2 18:55:02 2021, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
At Sat Jan 2 19:40:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Jan 2 20:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Bottom of plate could be done cleanly with just 4 quads :( Why go with such a complicated sheme???
Wondering for bottom of the truncated stud4 efficiency: Ring primitive as you did or tang one?

At Sat Jan 2 21:25:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
forgot condlines at the half stud and the pin cutout

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Jan 2 21:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
simplified bottom of plate

Maybe we should get this kind of half stud4 as a primitive

At Sun Jan 3 13:40:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Dunno for the cut stud4. Is it used elsewhere?
Otherwise here are the 4 quads I meant ;)
4 16 6.765 12 14 5.602 12 12 -5.6023 12 12 -6.765 12 14
4 16 6.765 12 14 -6.765 12 14 -16 12 26 16 12 26
4 16 16 12 10 10 12 10 6.765 12 14 16 12 26
4 16 -6.765 12 14 -10 12 10 -16 12 10 -16 12 26
At Thu Jan 7 05:45:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why the use of the ring primitives?