Unofficial File parts/72008.dat
File Header:
0 Technic Connector Block 2 x 2 with 1 x 1 Cutout
0 Name: 72008.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
Status:

Size: 1867 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify MagFors=novote SwampKryakwa=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jan 2 22:00:02 2021, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Not sure if the hole at the 2L section goes all the way through or if there's a stop.
Whan do you think of placing 1-16 chrds to close the gaps at the axle hole in hi res?
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Not sure if the hole at the 2L section goes all the way through or if there's a stop.
Whan do you think of placing 1-16 chrds to close the gaps at the axle hole in hi res?
At Wed Jan 13 20:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Adding ering prims, or 1-16chrd, is a really good idea. But I wonder if it shouldn't be done to the axle prims instead?
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Adding ering prims, or 1-16chrd, is a really good idea. But I wonder if it shouldn't be done to the axle prims instead?
At Wed Sep 14 09:45:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Wed Sep 14 18:15:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: SwampKryakwa
Certification: novote
Comments:
Better use npeghol4 instead of npeghol5, would curve corners on both sides of the npeghol
Reviewer: SwampKryakwa
Certification: novote
Comments:
Better use npeghol4 instead of npeghol5, would curve corners on both sides of the npeghol
At Wed Sep 14 19:50:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Not possible, since npeghol4 adds unwanted edge lines.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Not possible, since npeghol4 adds unwanted edge lines.
At Wed Sep 14 21:15:02 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: SwampKryakwa
Certification: novote
Comments:
Should then have new npeghole shape hard-modeled in I guess?
Reviewer: SwampKryakwa
Certification: novote
Comments:
Should then have new npeghole shape hard-modeled in I guess?
At Sun Sep 25 00:35:01 2022, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: SwampKryakwa
Comments:
Replaced all of npeghol geometry with a primitive
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: SwampKryakwa
Comments:
Replaced all of npeghol geometry with a primitive
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Sep 30 09:15:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Tue Oct 4 17:55:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can't find any support for a open, nor a blocked hole...
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can't find any support for a open, nor a blocked hole...
At Tue Oct 4 19:00:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: SwampKryakwa
Certification: novote
Comments:
Page 9 of BI for set 75335 suggests it is a blocked hole - instead of using a 4L axle, two 2L ones are used
Reviewer: SwampKryakwa
Certification: novote
Comments:
Page 9 of BI for set 75335 suggests it is a blocked hole - instead of using a 4L axle, two 2L ones are used
3D View