Unofficial File parts/71708.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Beam  2 x  3 Liftarm Bent 90 Quarter Ellipse
0 Name: 71708.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2020-12-17 [GeraldLasser] Derived from 64683s01 by Philo

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSN)
Size: 5034 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=novote
Holly-Wood=novote
MMR1988=novote
Philo=certify
fwcain=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Technic Peg Hole Negative with Top Surface Extensions
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSF)
Download: p/npeghol2.dat
Technic Peg Hole Negative without Top Surface Extensions
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (SF)
Download: p/npeghole.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Dec 17 12:25:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Orientation, shall it be along the liftarms or like the panels...

At Thu Dec 17 13:20:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
Thansk to Philo for the number

At Thu Dec 17 15:15:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Either works... OK with beam naming+beam orientation. Nonetheless:
- Panel keyword?
- Erings around axlehole?

At Sat Nov 27 03:35:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Dec 10 20:35:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, an ering around the axle hole would be nice.
I would prefer an orientation like 32250.dat.

At Fri Dec 10 21:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
Orientation is the same....

I don't get you, origin is at the corner axle hole at both parts

At Sat Dec 11 07:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
I confirm that origin/orientation are fine and matches 32250

At Sun Dec 12 16:55:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
What's about the ering?

At Wed Sep 28 09:10:02 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
* I agree with Max on the ering.
* Some T-Junk should be fixed.
* Has rounding issues (example):

2 11 24.365 -2 15.9715 24.365 -2 15.971
2 11 6.3639 -10 13.6361 6.36 -10 13.64
2 11 6.3639 -10 6.3639 6.36 -10 6.36