Unofficial File parts/66955.dat
File Header:
0 Slope Brick Curved 4 x 3.5 x 1 Double Stepped
0 Name: 66955.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS Armour, Scales
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 1974 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify MMR1988=certify MagFors=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Needs admin review. (CCN)Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Jul 20 22:20:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why "Double Stepped"? I see 3 steps ...
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why "Double Stepped"? I see 3 steps ...
At Tue Jul 20 22:25:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I borrowed the description from part 93273
so the double, means the shape, not the steps
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I borrowed the description from part 93273
so the double, means the shape, not the steps
At Sun Aug 29 09:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Mon Nov 8 09:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
-24.0002, -19.0002, -16.0002, -12.0002
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
-24.0002, -19.0002, -16.0002, -12.0002
At Thu Nov 11 13:20:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
rounded
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
rounded
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Nov 11 15:00:02 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
* Bad orientation. Has to be rotated 90 degree counter clockwise.
* Understud needs a hole 1 16 20 -20 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 stud3.dat:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-As6UXuHdbNw/YCDWFyK3VUI/AAAAAAAATzs/5VakxWOZ-Lko7Oq5bRXIusvirfBLCbCQwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1800/71720_Fire_Stone_Mech_03a.jpg
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
* Bad orientation. Has to be rotated 90 degree counter clockwise.
* Understud needs a hole 1 16 20 -20 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 stud3.dat:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-As6UXuHdbNw/YCDWFyK3VUI/AAAAAAAATzs/5VakxWOZ-Lko7Oq5bRXIusvirfBLCbCQwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1800/71720_Fire_Stone_Mech_03a.jpg
At Thu Nov 11 16:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
regarding orientation:
It is aligned with the other curved slopes
Bottom Hole
I think there was a discussion once if those should be modeled or not. Agreement at that time was no, although it is practically a valid attachment it is nowhere in our parts.
I do have 1 x 6 plates, that can fit and others that have a pretty loose connection.
If we want to use this connections (no objections), we need to recycle a considerable amount of parts.
I would suggest a new primitive, stud3h(ollow) or something
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
regarding orientation:
It is aligned with the other curved slopes
Bottom Hole
I think there was a discussion once if those should be modeled or not. Agreement at that time was no, although it is practically a valid attachment it is nowhere in our parts.
I do have 1 x 6 plates, that can fit and others that have a pretty loose connection.
If we want to use this connections (no objections), we need to recycle a considerable amount of parts.
I would suggest a new primitive, stud3h(ollow) or something
At Thu Nov 11 20:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
You're talking about the orientation of: 15068 or 50950 or 61484?
Well then it has to be rotated 90 degree counter clockwise.
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
You're talking about the orientation of: 15068 or 50950 or 61484?
Well then it has to be rotated 90 degree counter clockwise.
At Thu Nov 11 22:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
If I look at 93273, the curve ist in the same plane, that's where I came from
What do we do with the bottom stud3?
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
If I look at 93273, the curve ist in the same plane, that's where I came from
What do we do with the bottom stud3?
At Fri Nov 12 07:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
Ah, now I see. Since the slopping is much more significant that the rounding it should go with:
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=66956
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=47457
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=30602
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=44675
so please rotate 90 degree counter clockwise
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
Ah, now I see. Since the slopping is much more significant that the rounding it should go with:
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=66956
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=47457
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=30602
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=44675
so please rotate 90 degree counter clockwise
At Sat Nov 20 22:15:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
rotated
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
rotated
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Nov 22 13:55:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Mon Nov 22 19:40:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Tue Dec 7 20:20:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Still think Double Stepped is confusing ...
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Still think Double Stepped is confusing ...
3D View