Unofficial File parts/6637.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Moved to 75815
0 Name: 6637.dat
0 Author: [PTadmin]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSF)
Size: 223 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Steffen=novote
fwcain=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Electric Technic Fiber Optics Element
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Download: parts/75815.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Oct 10 15:32:01 2007, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
At Wed Oct 10 15:34:09 2007, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
For backward comnpatibility reasons the part origin should not be changed, however obscure or incorrect it is in the official library.

At Wed Oct 10 18:46:04 2007, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Changed origin back. Now the origin is 2LDU above the axle hole.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Nov 2 08:44:02 2007, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
This should be part 6637c01, as 6637 is only the lower part (6638 is the upper part, and 6639 is the middle part). The subfiles should be readjusted with these new numbers.

At Mon Jul 25 21:05:53 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
- strange line in header:
0 Official LCad update 99-01
- syntax error in Author: header line

At Thu Nov 3 22:25:04 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
corrected author line

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Nov 7 15:00:05 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Highly over subparted imho, but it's done this way for such a long time...

At Tue Mar 27 07:35:03 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think all the subparts should be renumbered to s01, s02, ...

At Wed May 1 02:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: hold
Comments:
Steffan is correct -- the sub-parts need to be renamed, to use the "s##" suffix schema.
At Wed May 1 08:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:

Something is very wrong in the handling of these files.
The old history is removed. They are published and official.

This is an assembly of three parts. The correct numbers are stated above; 6637, 6638, 6639
The assembly should be 6637c01.

But I don't know how to sort all of the content in these files.

My suggestion:
Create 6637c01 = 6637e + 6638 + 6639 (Four new files, with subparts)
6637 would be a Move to 6637c01, with a corrected origin.
and make 6637a-6637d obsolete.

Would this work?
At Wed May 1 23:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: hold
Comments:
Assembly should be 75815. The rest of your approach sounds correct (especially the part about how to handle the odd origin).

For trivia buffs, there's a spring missing (71171), but I doubt anyone is going to care. :)

At Wed May 8 22:05:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
This should be changed to ~Moved to 75815

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri May 10 17:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

This _is_ a ~Moved to 75815, but the description has to be changed by Admin.
The Part Tracker won't allow me, or anyone, to upload a ~Moved to-file.

At Fri May 17 18:10:02 2019 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Sat May 18 05:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jun 12 21:50:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as this now is a moved-to,
there is a chance to correct the origin at the new destination part.
(see discussion above).

should we do that?