Unofficial File parts/65473.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Brick Round  2 x  2 Curved 135 Degree 
0 Name: 65473.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Elbow

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 497 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Cheenzo=novote
GeraldLasser=novote
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
RainbowDolphin=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Oct 13 10:35:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Finally figured out the radius of this part and how it fits into the system. Centre Axlehole radius is 72 LDU or three bricks high

Not fully satisfied with the name though

At Tue Oct 13 15:05:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why 135 degree in the description? I see only 45.
Why is the rotation centre at 72 ldu, and not at 70?

At Tue Oct 13 16:55:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
That's the BL Name
LEGO calls it DESIGN ELEMENT,DEG.135,W/ CROSSHOLE,NO.1

I think the origin shall move as well, i.e. it shall extend down, meaning opposite from what it is now.

Rotation center is at 72 because if you stack seven 32064a, put an 2L Axle in the top and bottom brick, the semi-circular tube fits exactly and the centers of the axleholes are 144 LDU apart. In this way a clever design decision. When I first put them on a Technic beam and the holes did not match, I was like, hm... what did they think about when designing this and how to get the proper diameter...
But to stack the technic Bricks only came into my mind when I reviewed the Dinosaur body 40374

1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 15 0 -24 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 4 0 -48 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 15 0 -72 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 4 0 -96 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 15 0 -120 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 4 0 -144 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32064b.dat
1 71 0 -134 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 4519.dat
1 71 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 4519.dat
1 0 0 -134 -10 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 65473.dat
1 4 0 -112.91176438 -60.91163562 0 0 1 0.70710678 0.70710678 0 -0.70710678 0.70710678 0 32062.dat
1 0 0 -112.91176438 -60.91163562 0 0 1 0.70710678 -0.70710678 0 0.70710678 0.70710678 0 65473.dat
1 4 0 -62.00016717 -81.999964 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 32062.dat
1 0 0 -62.00016717 -81.999964 0 0 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 65473.dat
1 4 0 -11.08853155 -60.91172838 0 0 1 0.70710678 -0.70710678 0 0.70710678 0.70710678 0 32062.dat
1 0 0 -11.08832838 -60.9115972 0 0 1 -0.70710678 -0.70710678 0 0.70710678 -0.70710678 0 65473.dat
At Tue Oct 13 17:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Cheenzo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I guess 135 is the angle between the two axle holes but 45 would be better as a part description

At Wed Oct 14 00:50:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: RainbowDolphin
Certification: novote
Comments:
If this part used primarily as a torus segment, "45 degree" is appropriate. But as a bent joint for axles (cousin of 32192), the description "135 degree" will be reasonable. IMO, the former "45" is preferred from the viewpoint of part shape.

At Thu Oct 22 19:40:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, might go with the 45 deg description.

I was surprised to find out that the part already found its way already into the last stud.io update as unofficial one

At Fri Oct 23 15:55:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I discovered you made this part through Studio update! ;)
I'd prefer 45degrees in description too... Please add the 72 LDU radius as !HELP.

At Tue Nov 3 22:40:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I too would prefer 45 Degrees.

At Wed Nov 4 20:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.