Unofficial File parts/65422.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Rotor Blade 19L with Beam  3L
0 Name: 65422.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Size: 309 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Technic Beam 3
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSF)
Download: parts/32523.dat
~Technic Rotor Blade 19L without Beam 3L
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Sep 3 20:15:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
At Fri Sep 4 14:10:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
You should use connhole instead of peghole+cyli+ring8. Simpler, and automatic inherited connectivity in LDCad

At Fri Sep 4 16:55:02 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
swapped pegholes for a connhole

that was an artefact of inlining the 3L Beam

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Sep 6 06:50:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Looks like there is a dimensional issue (collision), here is a snapshot sent to me by Alfred Schmitz:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/misc2/65422.jpg

At Fri Sep 11 13:05:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: hold
Comments:
You made me quickly build the relevant section :-)

My findings:
If Albert has a collision issue there, there is a mistake in the model.

Part 32039 (Axle Connector with Axle Hole) is mounted there with Part 32209 (Axle 5.5 with Stop) which gives it an offset of half a unit, avoiding the Blade. So that end is fine.

HOWEVER:
When building the section, I found out that the blade is slightly bent. That is actually a clever design decision. If the blade would be straight, it would block the opposite axlehole and you need to use a bit of force to move it out of the way to but the flex-axle in.
But because it is has a minuscule bent, this bent makes the tip avoid the opposite axlehole just to let the felx-axle go in.

So I need to introduce this modification. You wont notice when you hold the part!

Very clever move by the part designer...

At Sat Sep 12 07:00:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, Alfred confirmed he made a mistake in the model. At least it was useful to find the subtle bending ;)

At Sat Mar 6 16:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
After looking again at Sariel's video I'm convinced that this part is not slightly bent, but simply quite flexible.
https://youtu.be/5c6xoochiOI?t=521
I propose to keep this straight version and make two -fx bent versions (left and right of car!!!). They can be done easily from existing barely modified subpart using slant (slanting may need to be tuned more finely)
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 .02 -1 s\65422s01.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 .02 1 s\65422s01.dat
For this sheme to work you need to use a 32523 in main part and get rid of (needlessly complex!) beam intersection in subpart.

At Tue May 4 14:15:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Modified with Gerald agreement to allow blade slanting

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Jun 26 13:20:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.