Unofficial File parts/62809c01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Minifig Keys (2) on Sprue
0 Name: 62809c01.dat
0 Author: Andy Westrate [westrate]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Minifig Accessory

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 386 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
Steffen=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Sprue for Minifig Keys (2)
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCCSN)
Download: parts/62809.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Nov 13 04:24:02 2009, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: westrate
Comments:
Two keys on sprue

At Sat Sep 18 02:25:02 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: westrate
Comments:
Fixed Author line

At Thu Aug 9 13:20:05 2012 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Fri Nov 21 22:20:00 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
BFCed

At Sat Nov 22 11:20:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Should get alias 40359 (http://brickset.com/parts/design-40359)

At Sat Nov 22 14:00:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think that this file should simply be MOVED TO there.
In this special case, I don't see a reason to keep the c01 file.

At Sat Nov 22 14:30:01 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree.
Is this even a Shortcut?
To me, that number, 40359, is in it self a part. It's one mould.
1 sprue + 2 keys = 1 part. It's not an assembly.

The really strange thing is that the spue has its own partnumber. Why?
At Sat Nov 22 14:45:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
increasing to hold for renumbering

well, sprues need to be produced, so someone needs to uniquely
number the moulds :)))

At Sat Nov 22 14:55:01 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
(keeping hold)

ah, now I understand your wondering.
why just the sprue (!) has a number on its own.
indeed. strange.

however, I still suggest renumbering this file

At Sat Nov 22 16:15:01 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Agreed, needs renumbering AND is a part, not a shortcut.
"The really strange thing is that the spue has its own partnumber. Why?"
I guess someone at LUT wrongly affected a number to the sprue (62808 is actually a number affected to the key for LUT/LDD purpose, not a mold number)

At Wed Jan 24 17:35:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

I think all sprues/mould have their own number. It's equal to "the number of the sprue + parts".
Look at parts 6246a-6246f. We didn't know their correct partnumbers until they showed up in LDD.
Now we now them as 55295-55300 and the entire mould, including the sprue, is 6246.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-6246
At Thu Jan 25 04:00:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold, I am completely confused here.
should the type of this changed to "Part", to avoid that a gap gets created between the sprue and the 2 keys?