Unofficial File parts/6156.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Panel  1 x  4 x  3 with Fixed Transparent Light Blue Glass
0 Name: 6156.dat
0 Author: Thomas Burger [grapeape]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 1998-07-15 [PTadmin] Official Update 1998-07
0 !HISTORY 2007-07-16 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2017-09-03 [MagFors] bfc'd, subfiled glass
0 !HISTORY 2020-06-13 [MagFors] Made subfiles

Status:
1 'hold' vote. (HSSF)
Size: 621 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=hold
MagFors=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Sep 4 17:05:01 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Tue Jun 2 20:25:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm fairly sure the glass here should be Trans Light Blue rather than Trans Medium Blue

At Sat Jun 13 16:15:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree, the colour is wrong.
Do you know if this is an assembly or a dual-mould? Partnumbers? Maybe the glass as a subfile is wrong?
Should I make 2 unknown partnumbers instead?
At Sat Jun 13 17:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: hold
Comments:
Unfortunately I don't actually have one to check, but I suspect from the photos online that it's an assembly, albeit one which comes preassembled and is probably not separable.

At Tue Aug 25 12:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks like a dual mold:

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/a9wAAOSwg9RdxsBS/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/dCcAAOSw9~5ZW7Dw/s-l1600.jpg

At Tue Jul 20 22:40:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm reworking this one. And the question remains. Is it an assembly or a dual mould?
Should I have edge lines between the two sub-parts?

From images it looks like an impossible assemby.
Did lego do dual moulding in the early 90ties? This part is only in 3 sets in the year 94-98.
At Wed Jul 21 15:40:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I decided to go for a dual mould design, without edge lines between the subparts.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Jul 23 13:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
Wrong stud orientation.

This looks really strange without the edges. As you are going to treat the faces as there where no interruption why did you keep these:

2 24 33 7 8 33 45 8
2 24 -33 45 8 -33 7 8

I think leaving them all out is a Bad Idea(TM)

At Fri Jul 23 21:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Stud orientation fixed in the subfile.

Yes, I find the images of this part confusing, and I can't understand how it is put together.
I see nothing wrong in keeping the internal edge lines visible. I even added some lines to hint the underside of the topstuds.

At Tue Jul 27 01:35:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry, but I'm gonna keep my hold. Either all edges in or all edges out. This way it looks really strange.