Unofficial File parts/6003.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Plate  6 x  6 with  4 x  4 Round Corner
0 Name: 6003.dat
0 Author: James Jessiman
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2001-12-31 [PTadmin] Official Update 2001-03
0 !HISTORY 2007-07-09 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2008-12-30 [mikeheide] BFC'ed and used some more primitives
0 !HISTORY 2009-07-04 [Eldar] Fix a stud orientation
0 !HISTORY 2020-11-17 [UR] Optimized round corner, stug group (move to)
0 !HISTORY 2020-12-16 [UR] Cutouts, Description


0 BFC INVERTNEXT
Status:
Needs more votes. (F)
Size: 13328 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Nov 22 19:55:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: UR
At Sun Nov 22 21:40:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
This stud causes a collision with the border:

1 16 -50 0 -50 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 stud.dat

The real part has a recessed border there.
https://rebrickable.com/media/parts/photos/27/6003-27-b4c2b339-9257-4a7c-b37e-95bcf5b1bd34.jpg

Could use Stug4-4x4 and Stug4-1x3 for the underside studs.

At Sun Nov 22 22:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
It is missing cutouts for three studs.
1 16 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stug-6x6.dat
Add this and have a look at it.
Note also that the holes in the side are too small.

The description should be extended and describe the radius of the circular section.
Like 6162, 30357 and 68568
At Wed Dec 16 03:45:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Comments:
Thank you both for the good Informations....

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Dec 19 21:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Some bad condlines in the stud cutouts.

Don't think it needs to be hi-res.

At Tue Jan 5 15:05:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Jan 14 22:20:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing condlines next to the cutouts.
Don't think it needs to be hi-res.

At Wed Mar 10 17:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Comments:
THX

...with the hi-res it's clean ... how else do you want to do it? .... with 1-8?

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Mar 27 16:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, using 1-8 would be better.