Unofficial File parts/50922.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Constraction Limb  5 x  6 with Ball Joint and 7 Pinholes
0 Name: 50922.dat
0 Author: Kevin Roach [KROACH]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Technic, Bionicle, Toa, Hordika

0 !HISTORY 2014-04-20 [KROACH] Added missing condlines
0 !HISTORY 2014-04-20 [KROACH] Moved origin
0 !HISTORY 2014-06-02 [KROACH] Added missing lines and corrected condlines.
0 !HISTORY 2016-02-25 [KROACH] Reworked some areas
0 !HISTORY 2021-03-31 [Sirio] Fixed sphere joint and corrected intermediate rotation of circular primitives

Status:
4 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSN)
Size: 61639 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Cone 39 x 0.1875
Status: Needs admin review. (CCN)
Download: p/3-16con39.dat
Disc Negative Tangent 0.1875
Status: Needs admin review. (CCN)
Download: p/3-16tang.dat
Technic Axle Hole Perimeter
Status: Needs admin review. (CCF)
Download: p/axlehol8.dat
Axle Sloped
Status: Needs admin review. (CCN)
Download: p/axles.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Apr 19 06:45:04 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
At Sat Apr 19 10:25:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: hold
Comments:
- Bionicle is not a category, missing 'Technic' in the part title..? Since Bionicle is in the title it shouldn't be a keyword.

- did you possibly forget a ball joint out of the part? :-)

At Sat Apr 19 16:50:05 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Apr 20 11:20:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Great part. Go ahead with the other bionicle stuff :)

At Sun Apr 20 11:45:09 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry for holding this part, but several condlines are missing. (where the cyli faces meet the other quads of round areas)

At Sun Apr 20 12:45:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm uncertain about the origin, IMO it should be in the ball joint for easier articulation.

At Sun Apr 20 12:45:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
plus we have other arm parts where the origin is in the ball joint: 47300.dat, 41670.dat, possibly others.

At Sun Apr 20 17:05:08 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added missing condlines and moved origin.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Apr 21 07:50:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
These condlines are still missing:

5 9 6.364 -33.636 -50 6.364 -33.636 -52 5 -32.7247 -50 8.3151 -36.5557 -50
5 9 -2 -56.5558 -11.6851 -9 -56.5558 -11.6851 -9 -57.364 -11.5243 -9 -53.636 -13.636
5 9 9 -56.5558 -11.6851 2 -56.5558 -11.6851 2 -57.364 -11.5243 9 -53.636 -13.636
5 9 -2 -62.1213 13.1213 -2.79664 -62.1213 13.1213 -2.84257 -62.7717 12.1481 -2 -62 13.2024
5 9 -2.99688 -62.1213 8.8787 -2 -62.1213 8.8787 -2 -62.7717 9.8519 -3.0007 -62 8.7976
5 9 2.79664 -62.1213 13.1213 2 -62.1213 13.1213 2 -62.7717 12.1481 2 -62 13.2024
5 9 2 -62.1213 8.8787 2.99688 -62.1213 8.8787 2.95094 -62.7717 9.8519 3.0007 -62 8.7976
5 9 -3.8409 -76.7899 -9.004 3.8409 -76.7899 -9.004 3.36048 -75.3657 1.1748 4 -76.9644 -12.375
5 9 -9 -83.4441 -71.6851 -2 -83.4441 -71.6851 -2 -79.9999 -70.9998 -9 -84.9456 -72.6883
5 9 -2 -73.6359 -73.6358 -9 -73.6359 -73.6358 -9 -76.5559 -71.6852 -9 -72.6328 -75.1375
5 9 2 -83.4441 -71.6851 9 -83.4441 -71.6851 9 -79.9999 -70.9998 9 -84.9456 -72.6883
5 9 9 -73.6359 -73.6358 2 -73.6359 -73.6358 9 -76.5559 -71.6852 9 -72.6328 -75.1375
5 9 -2 -72.5648 -74.7955 -9 -72.5648 -74.7955 -9 -72.6328 -75.1375 -2 -69.6169 -70.383
5 9 9 -72.5648 -74.7955 2 -72.5648 -74.7955 2 -72.6328 -75.1375 9 -69.6169 -70.383
5 9 -9 -65.2045 -67.4352 -2 -65.2045 -67.4352 -9 -64.8625 -67.3672 -9 -69.6169 -70.383
5 9 2 -65.2045 -67.4352 9 -65.2045 -67.4352 2 -64.8625 -67.3672 9 -69.6169 -70.383
5 9 -9 -84.3904 -69.8973 -2 -84.3904 -69.8973 -2 -84.9456 -72.6884 -9 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 9 2 -84.3904 -69.8973 9 -84.3904 -69.8973 9 -84.9456 -72.6884 2 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 9 -2 -70.1028 -55.6096 -9 -70.1028 -55.6096 -9 -69 -55.3902 -9 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 9 9 -70.1028 -55.6096 2 -70.1028 -55.6096 2 -69 -55.3902 9 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 9 -9 -70.1627 -75.7905 -2 -70.1627 -75.7905 -9 -70.4757 -77.364 -9 -67.7781 -72.2219
5 9 2 -70.1627 -75.7905 9 -70.1627 -75.7905 2 -70.4757 -77.364 9 -67.7781 -72.2219
5 9 -9 -71.0978 -53.2075 9 -71.0978 -53.2075 -9 -69 -52.7902 -9 -80.5059 -59.4941
At Mon Apr 21 08:55:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
@MMR1988
Please explain - step by step - how you got these lines :)

At Mon Apr 21 10:05:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Well, I used edger2 with options: -c -b -s for this.
After edgers calculation I checked these lines visually in LDView. In this case I could confirm, that all lines given by edger are really missing...
Note: Before using edger I checked the part visually for missing edges and I found at least 4 of those missing lines. Due to the complexity of this part I used edger. For simple parts I try to use the slower way: my brain. :-)
At Mon Apr 21 14:40:11 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
O.....K.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Apr 21 18:35:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
I'm not fully convinced by the description, but I have no better suggestion for it...

At Sun Jun 1 09:50:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

These cond-lines are not correct.
5 4 2.02765 -63.4135 29.4142 -2.02765 -63.4135 29.4142 5 -62.7654 29.8478 5 -64 28.8284
5 14 2.02765 -63.4135 29.4142 -2.02765 -63.4135 29.4142 5 -68.6251 20.5534 5 -57.5993 37.9785

Missing edge-lines, in all four corners, here:
2 4 2 -86.36 -86.36 2 -86.362 -91.3978
2 4 2 -73.638 -91.3978 2 -73.64 -86.36
2 4 -2 -86.36 -86.36 -2 -86.362 -91.3978
2 4 -2 -73.638 -91.3978 -2 -73.64 -86.36

At Tue Jun 3 00:30:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Made corrections.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jun 3 16:45:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

I'm sorry, but the lines in my review are all red.
Since you copied them, they're all incorrect now.

If you use my lines then you also have to change the four rect2a-prims into rect1.
The edge lines are partly duplicated.
At Tue Jun 17 22:00:07 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:

bump

At Wed Jun 18 09:35:01 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Some bleed-ins caused by a disc negative: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/66055976/2014/LDraw/50921-1.png

At Wed Jun 18 09:40:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
er, not a disc negative but the surface is bleeding in over there.

At Fri Jan 1 00:25:01 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
The edgeline and rectangle issue should be fixed now. Please check.
Also changed file title to be more descriptive.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Jan 1 17:35:01 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Line 536: Optional Line like Line found (700) 5 24 2.84956 -60 12 -2.84956 -60 12 5 -59.5858 12 5 -60.3827 11.9239

This is a very complex part. Will come back later again.

At Fri Jan 1 17:40:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Great work!

At Fri Jan 1 21:30:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Indeed great work, just some tiny problems:
There are two overlappings (quad covered completely by another quad) at both sides of the topmost horizontal connhole.
And one quad is coloured red.
At Sat Jan 2 14:25:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
confirmed
1 4 5.5 -86.364 -88.682 0 0 -3.5 0 -1 0 2.318 0 0 rect1.dat

At Thu Feb 25 05:55:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Replaced rings with quads.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Mar 7 17:20:01 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing cond lines on the "tail"
4 14 -3.8409 -76.7899 -9.004 3.8409 -76.7899 -9.004 3.3605 -75.3657 1.1748 -3.3605 -75.3657 1.1748
4 14 -2.8928 -72.6297 11.0843 -3.3605 -75.3657 1.1748 3.3605 -75.3657 1.1748 2.8928 -72.6297 11.0843
4 14 -2.4459 -68.6246 20.553 -2.8928 -72.6297 11.0843 2.8928 -72.6297 11.0843 2.4459 -68.6246 20.553
4 14 -2.0277 -63.4135 29.4142 -2.4459 -68.6246 20.553 2.4459 -68.6246 20.553 2.0277 -63.4135 29.4142
At Tue Mar 8 20:25:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added condlines.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 10 00:35:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Sent wrong file.

At Thu Mar 10 00:40:00 2016, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Oops.

At Sat Mar 26 10:45:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Several Condlines are missing:
5 5 6.364 -33.636 -50 6.364 -33.636 -52 5 -32.7247 -50 8.3151 -36.5557 -50
5 5 -2 -56.5558 -11.6851 -9 -56.5558 -11.6851 -9 -57.364 -11.5243 -2 -53.636 -13.636
5 5 9 -56.5558 -11.6851 2 -56.5558 -11.6851 2 -57.364 -11.5243 9 -53.636 -13.636
5 5 -16.168 -46.697 -72.799 -16.168 -46.697 -80 -16.9007 -43.0137 -80 -12.3743 -52.3743 -80
5 5 16.168 -46.697 -80 16.168 -46.697 -72.799 16.9007 -43.0137 -72.799 12.3743 -52.3743 -80
5 5 -9 -83.4442 -71.6851 -2 -83.4442 -71.6851 -2 -80 -70.9998 -9 -84.9456 -72.6883
5 5 -2 -73.636 -73.6358 -9 -73.636 -73.6358 -9 -76.5559 -71.6851 -9 -72.6328 -75.1375
5 5 2 -83.4442 -71.6851 9 -83.4442 -71.6851 9 -80 -70.9998 9 -84.9456 -72.6883
5 5 9 -73.636 -73.6358 2 -73.636 -73.6358 9 -76.5559 -71.6851 9 -72.6328 -75.1375
5 5 -2 -72.5648 -74.7955 -9 -72.5648 -74.7955 -9 -72.6328 -75.1375 -2 -69.6169 -70.383
5 5 9 -72.5648 -74.7955 2 -72.5648 -74.7955 2 -72.6328 -75.1375 9 -69.6169 -70.383
5 5 -9 -65.2045 -67.4352 -2 -65.2045 -67.4352 -9 -64.8625 -67.3672 -9 -69.6169 -70.383
5 5 2 -65.2045 -67.4352 9 -65.2045 -67.4352 2 -64.8625 -67.3672 9 -69.6169 -70.383
5 5 -9 -84.3904 -69.8972 -2 -84.3904 -69.8972 -2 -84.9456 -72.6884 -9 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 5 2 -84.3904 -69.8972 9 -84.3904 -69.8972 9 -84.9456 -72.6884 2 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 5 -2 -70.1028 -55.6096 -9 -70.1028 -55.6096 -9 -69 -55.3902 -9 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 5 9 -70.1028 -55.6096 2 -70.1028 -55.6096 2 -69 -55.3902 9 -78.6679 -61.3318
5 5 -9 -70.1627 -75.7904 -2 -70.1627 -75.7904 -9 -70.4757 -77.364 -9 -67.7781 -72.2219
5 5 2 -70.1627 -75.7904 9 -70.1627 -75.7904 2 -70.4757 -77.364 9 -67.7781 -72.2219
5 5 -9 -71.0978 -53.2075 9 -71.0978 -53.2075 -9 -69 -52.7901 -9 -80.5059 -59.4941

Here is a bleeding surface:
2 4 -6.3639 -33.6361 -52 -3.4443 -31.6849 -52

At Wed Mar 30 18:10:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Many not correctly working cond lines in the dent under the tail.
Should be divided into two groups of shorter lines.

At Fri Jul 10 23:15:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
missing dependency

At Sat Jul 11 15:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
Could not find 3-8con2.dat Referenced by 50922.dat
Could not find 3-8con39.dat Referenced by 50922.dat
Could not find axlehols.dat Referenced by 50922.dat

At Sat Apr 3 14:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Reworked some areas, added missing primitive

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Apr 4 09:10:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Fixed use of primitive axles instead of axleholes.

At Wed May 19 21:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing edge lines:
2 5 -2 -86.362 -91.3978 -2 -86.364 -91
2 5 -2 -73.638 -91.3978 -2 -73.636 -91
2 5 2 -73.638 -91.3978 2 -73.636 -91
2 5 2 -86.364 -91 2 -86.362 -91.3978

These are too much
1 5 0 -70 -108.5 0 0 -.5 0 -2 0 -.5 0 0 2-4cylc.dat
1 5 0 -70 -91.5 0 0 -.5 0 -1 0 -.5 0 0 2-4cylc.dat
Please use lo-res prims, or even a single rect prim.

And these should be eliminated
1 10 -2 -26 -54 0 1 0 0 0 -2.5 2.5 0 0 5-16ndis.dat
1 10 2 -26 -54 0 -1 0 0 0 -2.5 2.5 0 0 5-16ndis.dat
1 12 -2 -26 -54 0 1 0 1.7678 0 -1.7678 -1.7678 0 -1.7678 5-16ndis.dat
1 12 2 -26 -54 0 -1 0 1.7678 0 -1.7678 -1.7678 0 -1.7678 5-16ndis.dat

At Wed May 19 21:10:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I think it needs a different description. This is a Constraction part.

At Thu May 20 22:00:05 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Description changed. I'm not really convinced it's okay, if you don't like it, change it independently.

The previous description is used now as keywords.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri May 21 15:05:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Good description, but I think we should add some qualifiers.
Constraction Limb 5 x 6 with Ball Joint and 7 Pinholes
We allready have an example here, 87796 "Constraction Limb 3 x 7 Bent 53.13"

Isn't it also missing some comp cond lines on the bend?
At Fri May 21 21:35:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Can you tell me which lines are missing?
From a control with edger2 I do not result and visually I do not see them.

Updated description and fixed some control points in the back tip.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Jul 4 22:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing comp condlines here:
2 5 9 -56.5558 -11.6851 2 -56.5558 -11.6851
2 5 -9 -71.0983 -53.2069 9 -71.0983 -53.2069

Unmatched edges here, on both sides:
2 12 9 -69.61685657 -70.38301349 9 -65.20446813 -67.43532797
2 12 9 -72.5648 -74.7955 9 -69.61685657 -70.38301349
2 12 9 -72.6328 -75.1375 9 -72.5648 -74.7955
2 12 9 -64.8625 -67.3672 9 -65.2045 -67.4352
2 12 9 -63.4442 -68.3149 9 -64.8625 -67.4352
2 12 9 -71.6851 -76.5558 9 -72.6328 -75.1375
At Tue Jul 6 17:30:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jul 6 20:25:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Sep 5 19:20:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.