Unofficial File parts/44810.dat
File Header:
0 Technic Gear 9 Tooth with 3 Axle Holes and 2 Pin Holes
0 Name: 44810.dat
0 Author: Kevin Roach [KROACH]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-13 [KROACH] Added Technic to title
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-13 [KROACH] Changed description
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-13 [KROACH] Fixed long quad
Status:
Needs more votes. (X)
Size: 34231 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote arezey=novote technog=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Certified! (ACCX)Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Mar 13 16:30:03 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I just had a quick look - great work! The only thing I noticed that can be improved: on top side, the beam front quad is too long and bleeds through the gear ring.
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I just had a quick look - great work! The only thing I noticed that can be improved: on top side, the beam front quad is too long and bleeds through the gear ring.
At Thu Mar 13 17:40:08 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 13 17:55:03 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry... one of the quads is now backwards!
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry... one of the quads is now backwards!
At Thu Mar 13 19:25:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
I welcome the second eyes. There are things i should catch, but I don't.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
I welcome the second eyes. There are things i should catch, but I don't.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 13 20:00:06 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"There are things i should catch, but I don't."
Same thing for me ;)
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"There are things i should catch, but I don't."
Same thing for me ;)
At Thu Mar 13 20:35:02 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
That kind of is the entire point of this review and certification process anyway. :P
Looks like I was beaten to this one, I've been intending to model it for a while now. Will come back to review in full later, I'm in the middle of finalizing my own part.
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
That kind of is the entire point of this review and certification process anyway. :P
Looks like I was beaten to this one, I've been intending to model it for a while now. Will come back to review in full later, I'm in the middle of finalizing my own part.
At Thu Mar 13 20:35:03 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
This *definitely* is not an Arch though. I strongly believe this belongs in Technic.
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
This *definitely* is not an Arch though. I strongly believe this belongs in Technic.
At Thu Mar 13 21:05:05 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
That was not suppose to be there.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
That was not suppose to be there.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 13 21:35:08 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Technic is still missing from the part title, there is no Gear category. :)
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Technic is still missing from the part title, there is no Gear category. :)
At Thu Mar 13 22:20:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added Technic to title.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added Technic to title.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Mar 14 00:15:02 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Corrected another error I found.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Corrected another error I found.
At Fri Mar 14 11:50:03 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: hold
Comments:
Okay, took a closer look now. It otherwise looks good to me, but the center axlehole should have a stop of some sort inside it. An axle does not pass through it. There's a stop inside of it.
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: hold
Comments:
Okay, took a closer look now. It otherwise looks good to me, but the center axlehole should have a stop of some sort inside it. An axle does not pass through it. There's a stop inside of it.
At Sat Mar 15 02:35:02 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added axle stop.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added axle stop.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Mar 16 02:40:04 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Part looks good to me now. I still find the name rather dubious.. this isn't really primarily a gear.
"Technic Connector Block 5 x 3(?) x 3 with Gear 9 Tooth Double Bevel"?
Either that or the good ol' peeron name with "Technic Bionicle Matoran Torso". This part never saw use outside Bionicle (though calling it strictly a matoran torso is a bit wrong...). And if we go by that logic, perhaps this part could be re-oriented to have the gear in the back?
Or is it really a gear first off? I really don't know here. Thoughts, people?
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Part looks good to me now. I still find the name rather dubious.. this isn't really primarily a gear.
"Technic Connector Block 5 x 3(?) x 3 with Gear 9 Tooth Double Bevel"?
Either that or the good ol' peeron name with "Technic Bionicle Matoran Torso". This part never saw use outside Bionicle (though calling it strictly a matoran torso is a bit wrong...). And if we go by that logic, perhaps this part could be re-oriented to have the gear in the back?
Or is it really a gear first off? I really don't know here. Thoughts, people?
At Sun Apr 6 17:30:11 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe something similar to these?
41666.dat "Technic Arm 1 x 6 with Gear 12 Tooth Double Bevel Ends"
41667.dat "Technic Arm 3 x 2 with Gear 36 Tooth Double Bevel Quarter"
How about: "Technic Arm 3 x 5 with Gear 24 Tooth Double Bevel Half" ?
IMO, it should have the same orientation as those two too.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe something similar to these?
41666.dat "Technic Arm 1 x 6 with Gear 12 Tooth Double Bevel Ends"
41667.dat "Technic Arm 3 x 2 with Gear 36 Tooth Double Bevel Quarter"
How about: "Technic Arm 3 x 5 with Gear 24 Tooth Double Bevel Half" ?
IMO, it should have the same orientation as those two too.
At Mon Jan 30 01:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: technog
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm curious you didn't use primitive toothb12.dat like all other double bevel gear parts instead of creating your own primitive?
Is there that much different to require a new tooth primitive?
Reviewer: technog
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm curious you didn't use primitive toothb12.dat like all other double bevel gear parts instead of creating your own primitive?
Is there that much different to require a new tooth primitive?
At Fri Jun 8 17:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Now that the Constraction is a thing, this should go into it. As a torso, it should be oriented as one.
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Now that the Constraction is a thing, this should go into it. As a torso, it should be oriented as one.
3D View