Unofficial File parts/44810.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Gear  9 Tooth with  3 Axle Holes and  2 Pin Holes
0 Name: 44810.dat
0 Author: Kevin Roach [KROACH]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2014-03-13 [KROACH] Added Technic to title
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-13 [KROACH] Changed description
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-13 [KROACH] Fixed long quad

Status:
Needs more votes. (X)
Size: 34231 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
arezey=novote
technog=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Ring 21 x 0.375
Status: Certified! (ACCX)
Download: p/3-8ring21.dat
Hi-Res Ring 14 x 0.375
Status: Certified! (ACCX)
Hi-Res Ring 30 x 0.375
Status: Certified! (ACCX)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Mar 13 16:10:04 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
At Thu Mar 13 16:30:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I just had a quick look - great work! The only thing I noticed that can be improved: on top side, the beam front quad is too long and bleeds through the gear ring.

At Thu Mar 13 17:40:08 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 13 17:55:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry... one of the quads is now backwards!

At Thu Mar 13 19:25:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
I welcome the second eyes. There are things i should catch, but I don't.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 13 20:00:06 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"There are things i should catch, but I don't."
Same thing for me ;)

At Thu Mar 13 20:35:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
That kind of is the entire point of this review and certification process anyway. :P

Looks like I was beaten to this one, I've been intending to model it for a while now. Will come back to review in full later, I'm in the middle of finalizing my own part.

At Thu Mar 13 20:35:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
This *definitely* is not an Arch though. I strongly believe this belongs in Technic.

At Thu Mar 13 21:05:05 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
That was not suppose to be there.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 13 21:35:08 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Technic is still missing from the part title, there is no Gear category. :)

At Thu Mar 13 22:20:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added Technic to title.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Mar 14 00:15:02 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Corrected another error I found.

At Fri Mar 14 11:50:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: hold
Comments:
Okay, took a closer look now. It otherwise looks good to me, but the center axlehole should have a stop of some sort inside it. An axle does not pass through it. There's a stop inside of it.

At Sat Mar 15 02:35:02 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added axle stop.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Mar 16 02:40:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Part looks good to me now. I still find the name rather dubious.. this isn't really primarily a gear.

"Technic Connector Block 5 x 3(?) x 3 with Gear 9 Tooth Double Bevel"?

Either that or the good ol' peeron name with "Technic Bionicle Matoran Torso". This part never saw use outside Bionicle (though calling it strictly a matoran torso is a bit wrong...). And if we go by that logic, perhaps this part could be re-oriented to have the gear in the back?

Or is it really a gear first off? I really don't know here. Thoughts, people?

At Sun Apr 6 17:30:11 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe something similar to these?
41666.dat "Technic Arm 1 x 6 with Gear 12 Tooth Double Bevel Ends"
41667.dat "Technic Arm 3 x 2 with Gear 36 Tooth Double Bevel Quarter"

How about: "Technic Arm 3 x 5 with Gear 24 Tooth Double Bevel Half" ?

IMO, it should have the same orientation as those two too.

At Mon Jan 30 01:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: technog
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm curious you didn't use primitive toothb12.dat like all other double bevel gear parts instead of creating your own primitive?
Is there that much different to require a new tooth primitive?

At Fri Jun 8 17:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Now that the Constraction is a thing, this should go into it. As a torso, it should be oriented as one.