Unofficial File parts/42924.dat
File Header:
0 Technic Pin Long with Friction Type 2
0 Name: 42924.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
Status:
6 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSSN)
Size: 3145 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Needs admin review. (CCN)
Needs more votes. (CN)Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Mar 18 16:45:02 2021, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
There are subtle geometry variations in all the new pins... didn't find a good scheme allowing reuse :(
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
There are subtle geometry variations in all the new pins... didn't find a good scheme allowing reuse :(
At Thu Mar 18 17:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
Shouldn't 6558 be renamed to something like "with Slotted Flange"? Because all the versions have slots.
Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
Shouldn't 6558 be renamed to something like "with Slotted Flange"? Because all the versions have slots.
At Thu Mar 18 19:10:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe... or we could simply use type1/type2.
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe... or we could simply use type1/type2.
At Thu Mar 18 20:35:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Please correct the ring primitive. The correct name is 3-16rin3.dat
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Please correct the ring primitive. The correct name is 3-16rin3.dat
At Sun Mar 21 12:10:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
votingtest
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
votingtest
At Sun Mar 21 19:15:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Changed ring, and deleted AGAIN the wrong prim file from my HD ;)
Opinions about "prim subfiling" using tilded files in p folder?
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Changed ring, and deleted AGAIN the wrong prim file from my HD ;)
Opinions about "prim subfiling" using tilded files in p folder?
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Mar 27 12:25:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Updated to use modular elements
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Updated to use modular elements
At Sun May 9 15:10:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Based on the images in this review I think confricrib2 should be rotated by 90 degrees.
https://brickset.com/article/57923/why-have-technic-pins-been-changed
One of the three ribs should be inline with the flattened surface on the middle ring.
The same error is also present in 61332 and 65304
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Based on the images in this review I think confricrib2 should be rotated by 90 degrees.
https://brickset.com/article/57923/why-have-technic-pins-been-changed
One of the three ribs should be inline with the flattened surface on the middle ring.
The same error is also present in 61332 and 65304
At Tue Jul 13 19:25:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
bump
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
bump
At Wed Jul 14 13:00:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Agreed, rotated both 120 degrees ribs.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Agreed, rotated both 120 degrees ribs.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Jul 14 18:40:01 2021, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Tue Mar 1 20:50:01 2022, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
Should we polish the title to describe the hole and the flat sides on the ring?
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
Should we polish the title to describe the hole and the flat sides on the ring?
3D View