Unofficial File parts/4288.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Wheel 13 x 20 Solid Rubber with Axle Hole
0 Name: 4288.dat
0 Author: John Van Zwieten [jvan]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CMDLINE -c256

0 !HISTORY 1998-10-15 [PTadmin] Official Update 1998-09
0 !HISTORY 2007-07-04 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2013-10-20 [Steffen] BFCed, used more primitives, added Needs Work
0 !HISTORY 2013-10-25 [Philo] Closed gaps, improved axle hole and shape

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCCSF)
Size: 10018 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Oct 23 09:50:05 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
At Wed Oct 23 22:10:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
New description should be:
Wheel 13 x 20 Solid Rubber with Axle Hole

At Thu Oct 24 06:30:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as far as I remember these wheels werent made from rubber but normal ABS

At Thu Oct 24 08:15:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
@Steffen: They are completely rubber made. Only thing I know, that TLG had used two different types of rubber. One very solid (before mid of the nineties) and very slimy one. (I hated the new version especially in Set 8462 ;-) , because the axle hole has been disappeared within the first uses of the model)

At Thu Oct 24 19:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
ah, then I had the harder one :)))

At Thu Oct 24 19:35:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
cmdline should be -c256 then

At Fri Oct 25 11:05:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Reworking it...

At Fri Oct 25 12:20:05 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Oct 27 16:15:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Oct 27 16:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
There must be something wrong with the condlines (in the subpart?).
Please see: http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b334/MMR88/LDraw/4288_zps738ff28f.png

At Sun Oct 27 17:50:42 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can not confirm your findings. If i look straight in axle direction all edges are drawn. If i turn the part a little like you have done i can also see all edgelines. If I turn further the lines are gone, but they need to, as there is a surface and not a sharp edge. So maybe you have mixed different versions.

At Sun Oct 27 17:50:45 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
But there is another minor error:
Line 21: Not scalable primitive is scaled. 1 16 0 0 -16.25 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 -16.25 0 axlehol3.dat
Line 22: Not scalable primitive is scaled. 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 -16.25 0 axlehol3.dat

At Sun Oct 27 19:00:08 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I checked again and again. I still have this condline problem. (Note: I cleared all my folders with ldraw related files...) ;-)
I think this problem causes in the non planar quads. The control points of the "bad" edges are pointing through the faces of these quads.

At Sun Oct 27 21:10:10 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
You might be right (did not had that deep look into that files), but visually I can not see any problem.

At Mon Oct 28 08:00:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Unscaled axle3 (though I don't see how this could hurt). The condline is improved by quad splitting in subpart. But I was not able to see the issue as clearly as shown in Max screenshot...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Oct 30 09:25:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I cannot see any problems in this part now, but isn't the whole shape a bit ugly? In my eyes it should be more round. Please see: http://www.bricklink.com/PL/4288.jpg?0
and compare with our model.

At Wed Oct 30 12:00:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks round enough for me.

At Sat Nov 2 11:20:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't know what you mean by "round enough". To me it doesn't look flat enough.
It doesn't look like a wide tracked sand tyre for use on soft surfaces.
At Mon Nov 12 21:45:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:

IMO, something is very wrong in this part. The tread surface should be flatter.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/MagFors/LDraw/pictures/Errors/4288.png
I don't have it, so I can't do any measuments.

At Sat Dec 29 20:00:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Magnus was right... improved shape.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Dec 31 04:15:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon Dec 31 08:20:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jan 2 16:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Maybe the date in the History should have been changed too.