Unofficial File parts/3705c01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Axle  4 Threaded
0 Name: 3705c01.dat
0 Author: Adriano Aicardi
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 1999-05-24 [PTadmin] Official Update 1999-04
0 !HISTORY 2007-06-29 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2014-11-21 [roland] Auto-corrected with libfix version of LDCad 1.4
0 !HISTORY 2015-01-01 [Philo] Used new subparts

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSF)
Size: 925 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Technic Axle Threaded Segment
Status: Needs admin review. (CCF)
~Technic Axle Threaded End
Status: Needs admin review. (CCX)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
~_Technic Axle 4 Threaded Black (Obsolete)
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSF)
Download: parts/73839.dat
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Dec 23 18:00:08 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: roland

At Sat Dec 27 22:45:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
WARNING "3705c01.dat" Line 70: Identical to line 40: 2 24 2 2 -40 2 2 -32
WARNING "3705c01.dat" Line 75: Identical to line 14: 2 24 -3.4 2 -40 -4.066 0 -40
WARNING "3705c01.dat" Line 211: Identical to line 27: 2 24 3.4 -2 -40 4.066 0 -40
WARNING "3705c01.dat" Line 410: Identical to line 380: 2 24 -2 -2 32 -2 -2 40

At Thu Jan 1 14:05:00 2015, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.

At Sat Jan 3 13:50:01 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


At Sat Jan 3 14:40:01 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't think, that this is a shortcut at all...
Unfortunately we don't know the correct number for this part...
And there is no source where we can get further informations.
I even don't know if the number of the "Nut" is the right one...


At Sat Jan 3 15:20:00 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
"Unfortunately we don't know the correct number for this part..."
Maybe we could use the number used for black colored shortcut. It would make some sense... problem is that the colored shorcut is already official
"I even don't know if the number of the "Nut" is the right one..." I have good faith on this one.


At Sat Jan 3 17:05:01 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I didn't meant "Cert"...