Unofficial File parts/35477.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Brick  1 x  3 x  1.333 with Rounded Ends 
0 Name: 35477.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 1276 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
cwdee=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Dec 14 12:15:02 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
At Tue Dec 18 17:20:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

I think it also need a height dimenssion.
Is it possible to use a normal resolution cyli?

The Dulpo brick is called ".. Brick ... with Rounded Ends"
At Thu Jun 13 10:10:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
@Magnus, have a look at the comparison Hi/Lo-REs

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/lg008823/PartsAuthoring/35477_hi-lo_res.png

At Thu Jun 13 15:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
OK, looking at it once again I agree. The hi-res is much better.

But I find it harder to accept the description....
To me, this is a 1x2 with rounded ends. But I understand why it has to be 1x3.

At Thu Jun 13 20:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Thu Jun 13 20:40:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
should I rename it to 1x2 rounded ends? other opinions?

At Tue Jun 25 02:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would say yes.
When looking at this part, I see a 1x2 with something
instead of a 1x3.
What do others think?

At Tue Jun 25 07:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
"Brick 1 x 2 with Cylindrical Side Protrusions"?
I'd like the description to be clear that the brick is larger than 1 x 2 because of the side features.

At Tue Jun 25 15:50:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Brickset/LEGO call it "BRICK 1X3X1 1/3"
Bricklink use "Brick 1 x 3 with Round Ends"

We see a Brick 1x2 with rounded/cylindrical ends, but it is exactly 3 brick long (and 1.333 brick high).

The equivalent Duplo brick is called "Duplo Brick 2 x 4 x 2 with Rounded Ends", even if it is a Brick 2x2x2 with rounded ends.

Suggestion:
Brick 1 x 3 x 1.333 with Rounded Ends

Why?
We would use width x length on any other brick, so why not here?

Are the studs offset?
No, I don't think they are. Mainly because the bottom "studs" are not offset.


At Tue Jun 25 20:55:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Magnus. I agree with you

At Wed Jun 26 09:15:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm fine with that too.

At Wed Jun 26 10:00:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
changed name!

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Jun 30 11:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
The subfile needs a matching description.

At Thu Aug 8 20:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Bump