Unofficial File parts/32739.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Slope Brick 45  4 x  6 x  0.667 Double
0 Name: 32739.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // right

Status:
Needs admin review. (CCCCX)
Size: 3888 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify
MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
Steffen=certify
cwdee=novote
fwcain=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Jun 6 22:15:00 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I need to verify the bottom design.

At Wed Jun 7 13:50:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Jun 20 00:35:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Actually could use the stug3-1x3 primitive twice.

At Sat Nov 4 21:15:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: hold
Comments:
unfortunately it looks different, here's the underside:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/i0n5kj9bjyyp2et/IMG_20171104_213110.jpg?dl=0

At Sun Nov 5 09:25:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Thank you for the picture.
Maybe the unstudded middle area should be a little bit longer.
Is it possible to attach a 2x6 plate not using any of the four corners, or not?

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Nov 5 22:05:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, you cannot attach a 2x6 plate in the middle.

Do you want to reduce T-Junctions?

At Mon Nov 6 14:25:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
T junctions are not harful here (and removing them would cost more surfaces)

At Mon Nov 6 15:35:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
Comments:
right

At Sat Dec 23 10:40:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
I think this is a Slope ... Double, rather than a Wedge.

At Sat Dec 23 11:00:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Yes!

At Sat Dec 23 14:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, I want it to be sorted together with its siblings.
1 16 0 0 -50 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 61484.dat
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32739.dat
1 16 0 0 50 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 52031.dat
At Sat Dec 23 15:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Good point... though probably none of them should be wedges!

At Sun Mar 18 09:50:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
so this problem can be solved by retitling

61484.dat
32739.dat
52031.dat
and this file

, right?

At Tue May 28 02:15:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: novote
Comments:
Chris, you are an Admin. If you think this part needs to be re-titled (and, FWIW, I happen to agree with you), then you can make this correction yourself.
At Sat Jun 1 05:45:02 2019 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Sat Jun 1 21:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Re-titled

At Sun Jun 9 09:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ok, Thank you.

At Sun Jun 9 09:20:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jun 26 05:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.