0 Technic Ball Joint with Axlehole Blind 0 Name: 32474.dat 0 Author: Marc Schickele [samrotule] 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part 0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 !KEYWORDS bionicle, throwbot 0 !HISTORY 2004-04-22 [PTadmin] Official Update 2004-02 0 !HISTORY 2007-05-04 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement 0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01 0 !HISTORY 2008-07-07 [PTadmin] Renamed from 203 (2006-04-13) 0 !HISTORY 2008-10-26 [mikeheide] BFC'ed 0 !HISTORY 2008-10-31 [mikeheide] reduced 4-4sphe.dat to 12.75 to close visible gap 0 !HISTORY 2011-07-25 [PTadmin] Official Update 2011-01 0 !HISTORY 2013-06-30 [cwdee] Qualified description to distinguish from 53585 0 !HISTORY 2013-07-21 [PTadmin] Official Update 2013-01 0 !HISTORY 2014-05-24 [Philo] Subparted top for pattern 0 !HISTORY 2014-06-21 [PTadmin] Official Update 2014-01 0 !HISTORY 2021-08-02 [Berth] Subparted bottom for pattern 0 !HISTORY 2022-09-17 [MagFors] Reshaped for diameter 12.81
Size: 1378 bytes
Submitted by: Berth
This is now a strange mix of only trinagles in the sphere primitive, and some quads in the bottom section.
I think this part was made prior to the recreation of the sphere.
Maybe the bottom should be recreated using the new sphere prim?
Why is this one reduced to 12.75 when every other Technic ball joint is 12.81 ldu?
"0 !HISTORY 2008-10-31 [mikeheide] reduced 4-4sphe.dat to 12.75 to close visible gap"
...but that doen't really answer the question!
I measured my balls (pun intended) and depending on the place where I measure diameter I find values down to 10.05mm (12.56 ldu radius), up to 10.25mm (12.81 ldu radius). So 12.75 ldu is a perfectly valid value, probably better centered than 12.81. At least for this ball!
Submitted by: MagFors
Resized to 12.81 ldu, like all other technic balls
Existing certification-votes were deleted.