Unofficial File parts/32272ps1.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Dome  6 x  6 x  7 with SW Droid Head Quarter with Displays Pattern
0 Name: 32272ps1.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Star Wars, Artoo-Detoo, R2-D2, blue droid, astromech, x51ps1

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSX)
Size: 15370 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
arezey=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Technic Dome 6 x 6 x 7 without Top Surfaces
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSX)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Dec 7 11:50:03 2001, the file was initially submitted.
At Fri Dec 7 12:00:02 2001, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: wjwood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Mar 29 01:24:04 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: rosco
Certification: hold
Comments:
Lots of non-coplanar vertices. Check with L3P.

At Sat Jun 8 22:32:03 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: certify
Comments:
The non coplaner vertices are well within limits (<0.1)

At Sat Jun 8 22:34:03 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: hold
Comments:
But there are a lot of colinear vertices

At Sat Nov 22 07:42:03 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: novote
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Nov 25 12:10:02 2003, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: wjwood
Comments:
Updated to make BFC certified.

Checked with 'l3p -check -dist0.1' with no errors.

If you see any errors, please include the l3p parameters that you used so I can find them.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Dec 27 14:02:01 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: wjwood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Mar 23 20:04:07 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: westrate
Certification: hold
Comments:
Holding for non-coplanar quads (using l3p -check -det0.1 -dist0.1, see http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/l3pmsg/)
At Wed Mar 24 22:30:06 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: westrate
Certification: novote
Comments:
downgrading to novote; I've been informed that using the -det option with l3p -check can cause problems with larger parts
At Mon Dec 27 04:24:02 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
Comments:
Needs some header changes (can be done via Admin-update):

1. Title needs "SW" as part of Pattern description. (All "Star Wars" patterned files have the format "Blahblah with SW Blahblah Pattern".)

2. Needs Keywords: Star Wars, Artoo-Detoo, R2-D2, blue droid, astromech
At Wed Sep 10 19:56:36 2008, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
The original was authored by a non-CA affirmed author, but has never been in an official update. Holding for complete CA re-write. No new parts will be added to the NonCA library.

At Fri May 22 15:44:02 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
filename doesn't match our current scheme

At Tue Oct 19 20:30:07 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
file header needs to be fixed as well

At Sun Jul 13 12:25:03 2014 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Sun Jul 13 12:30:05 2014 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Fri Jan 26 09:55:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold

At Tue Jul 3 19:42:31 2018 part 'parts/x51ps1.dat' was renamed to 'parts/32272ps1.dat'.
At Tue Jul 3 19:55:00 2018 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Wed Jul 4 16:20:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Jul 6 08:05:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think that the "without Eye" should be removed from the title because it is inconsistent. We mention in the description what is present, not what is missing. Also the other pattern has "with Eye" so the "without Eye" is redundant.

At Fri Jul 6 09:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree with Arezey. Shouldn't the authorship remain to wjwood?

At Fri Jul 6 14:55:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
The current description was created by Chris, and he has, as usual, the final word.
The original was authored by a non-CA affirmed author, so I completely reworked the file and took ownership.
Did you find any error in the design, or the code?
At Fri Jul 6 15:20:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: hold
Comments:
Where did Chris say that the current description is final, though?

There seems to be some problem with the conditional edges in the pattern area: https://i.imgur.com/X6f6mKD.png

At Fri Jul 6 20:30:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm happy to listen to other suggestions for the title.

At Sat Jul 7 14:15:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Comes from non strictly coplanar quads. Can be seen also in blank part. Dunno if it's worth to try fixing.

At Sun Jul 8 14:50:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Jul 8 20:20:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: certify
Comments:
There's a conditional edge here(1) that seems to have weird control points. The blank part doesn't seem to have it. Has some tiny hairline gaps but seems fine to me otherwise.

(1): https://i.imgur.com/YI9FWKB.png

At Sun Jul 8 21:00:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think you might have a cache problem. I found, and removed, that bad line already.

All condlines are placed in the subfile, so if there are any problem, all three parts should be affected.

At Mon Jul 9 05:20:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: certify
Comments:
Hmm, indeed. The cache seems oddly persistent.