Unofficial File parts/3004p10.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Brick  1 x  2 with Red "3.09" in Black Display and Octan Text Pattern
0 Name: 3004p10.dat
0 Author: Massimo Maso [Sirio]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Bricklink 3004px1, Set 6562
0 !KEYWORDS City, Town, Gas

0 // Subparts
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 10990 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Logo Octan Red/Green Text without Borders
Status: Needs admin review. (CCN)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Feb 27 17:30:01 2021, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
At Sun May 30 15:50:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: RainbowDolphin
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon May 31 05:35:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Cheenzo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Missing a set keyword, i.e. Set 6562

At Tue Jun 1 08:10:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jun 1 10:40:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: RainbowDolphin
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Nov 27 18:05:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe this could use the borderless logo prim after it has been corrected?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/logo-octantext2.dat

At Mon Nov 29 19:45:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Sirio
Certification: novote
Comments:
IMHO it is not possible: the two texts do not have the same character. logo-octantext2 is wider than 2431pt and what I find on the actual piece. In particular, the tip of the t is different. It could be a "mistake" of realization, because it does not seem to me that there are more versions of the octan logo since it was born.

At Mon Nov 29 22:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe.
I would say it is possible, and that the new primitive fits better:
https://brickshelf.com/gallery/MagFors/LDraw/pictures/Errors/compair_3004pt2.png
But I agree, the t is different. Hm...

At Tue Nov 30 23:00:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Replaced.
I am not convinced that the dimensions are really correct. The scale factor should be.725, but due to the border around the text it is not possible to insert the logo with this scale. I have therefore reduced the scale factor to.68.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Nov 30 23:10:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The primitive should be made smaller, with less surrounding surface. (I had a similar issue with the torso 973pt2)
Your file have a s\ infront of the primitive.

At Wed Dec 1 15:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: L4mpi
Certification: novote
Comments:
Updated the Prim

At Thu Dec 2 00:35:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Dec 2 16:55:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Looks broken to me, and there's a concave quad.

At Fri Dec 3 16:30:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Dec 3 17:25:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Dec 10 21:00:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.