Unofficial File parts/28192.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Slope Brick 45  2 x  1 with Cutout and without Stud
0 Name: 28192.dat
0 Author: Owen Burgoyne [C3POwen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2019-12-29 [GeraldLasser] Removed inner stud cutout. Simplified geometry
0 !HISTORY 2020-01-09 [MagFors] Subfiled

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 496 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Jan 9 17:05:00 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: C3POwen
Comments:
My first LDraw part in quite some time, based on the image here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/brothers-brick/31407668660/

Underside shows small stud recess, suggesting that the hollow has
similar dimensions to 54200. This would make sense, as it would
strengthen the part on the inner corner. The stud recess is also not
present on 3040, which also implies a different inner height/angle.

Further info:
http://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=28192
http://www.brickowl.com/catalog/lego-slope-1-x-2-45-with-o-knobs-28192

At Mon Jan 9 17:35:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
is this the same as
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/28152.dat
?

At Mon Jan 9 18:00:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
It might be.
My number comes from this review:
http://www.newelementary.com/2016/12/review-lego-modular-assembly-square-10255.html#more
But Owens pictures are convincing. My design is assumed, and wrong.

At Sat Jan 21 18:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
This number is now present at Bricklink and Brickowl.
Still no number at Brickset.

I've bought some of these and the internal depth is not correct in your part.
The inside surface is parallel to the outside slope.
And I think we could eliminate the tiny stud cutout. It only adds unnecessary triangles.
I'll ask Admin to delete my version.

At Fri Apr 27 15:45:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
The tiny stud cutout is still there.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Dec 29 10:50:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Removed inner stud cutout, it is not intersecting
Simplified geometry

At Sun Dec 29 11:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Dec 29 19:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jan 8 17:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe we should subfile it?
There's already a printed version here: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=28192pb001#T=C&C=63

At Thu Jan 9 15:40:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
....agree with Magnus..makes sense..should be subfiled

At Thu Jan 9 21:40:02 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Created a subfile. Added history for the changes.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Feb 13 10:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.