Unofficial File parts/27262.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Windscreen  6 x  4 x  1 Pentagonal with Handle
0 Name: 27262.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW


Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 819 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Sep 5 10:25:00 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
upon request from the forum, made from photographs, handle is flattened in real part

still missing outside condlines

At Tue Sep 5 11:40:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
You should merge the quads on back top. "t-junctions" across a sharp edge never causes problems.

At Tue Sep 5 12:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I was misreading your comment, and thought, where did I miss a TJ?

But yes, I can do that.

Do you have recommendations on the condlines? i.e. the controlpoints? I tired to add them with CPs in line, then LDPE complains, LDView looks nice, but still they do not appear as they should...

Do you know any other part of similar surface?

At Tue Sep 5 14:20:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yeah, twisted surfaces don't play well with condlines. For a similar part (with similar problems!), see 43721.dat
Could be interesting to split in the middle to minimize the effect.
See also this 12 years old discussion (looks like my memory is not that bad after all!) http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=5652 and more precisely http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=5668

At Tue Sep 5 14:20:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
...and btw back of twisted surface misses edge lines ;)

At Mon Sep 25 20:50:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Included cond lines for the outer surface, let me know what you think.

I will then add them in the same way to the inside

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Sep 25 21:30:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think it would even be OK with two big triangles and a single cond-line.
3 16 -10 -10 -40 -10 -10 -10 -40 6 -40
3 16 -40 6 -40 -10 -10 -10 -20 -2 -10
5 24 -40 6 -40 -10 -10 -10 -20 -2 -10 -10 -10 -40
At Fri Sep 29 11:55:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Heartfully agree with Magnus' solution. Smoothing visually as good, no condlines artifacts.

At Sun Oct 1 21:00:01 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
Changed outer condlines, but arranged the triangles the other way round, looks more like the real thing

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Oct 21 17:15:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
seriously warped...

At Fri Dec 1 16:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.