Unofficial File parts/2654bp01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Dish  2 x  2 without Rim with Dark Red Lights and Dark Bluish Grey Circles Pattern
0 Name: 2654bp01.dat
0 Author: Evert-Jan Boer [ejboer]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Bricklink 2654pb004, Rebrickable 2654pr0001, Brickowl 384885
0 !KEYWORDS Set 75827, Set 21108, Set 71228, Ghostbusters, Proton Pack

0 !HISTORY 2021-11-01 [Holly-Wood] Changed subfile, changed light blue color, fixed unmatched vertices, changed description, added keywords

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (SSN)
Size: 113555 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
(no current reviews for this file)
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Feb 7 21:05:01 2021, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: ejboer
Comments:
First attempt, maybe some redundant vertex I missed.

At Sun Feb 21 17:30:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Isn't it missing all the black rings? Images of this print show printed black.

0 // Unmatched edges
2 4 -12.9499 4.8375 7.1 -12.4114 4.8375 7.9058
2 4 -12.4114 4.8375 7.9058 -12.05 4.8375 8.4466

Maybe a single subfile would be better than repeating all the code that make up the unprinted part?

I don't think 9, Light Blue is correct. Maybe Medium Blue, 73 or Bright_Light_Blue, 212 ?

At Mon Feb 22 20:15:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: ejboer
Certification: novote
Comments:
About the black rings, images I find show a more or less dark bluish grey part, but it only comes in black? Will try to get a good picture of the part for reference. My part has no distinction between the overall black color and the black rings around the red lights.

At Thu May 20 20:10:02 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
OK then, no black rings printed on a black part.

Missing "without Rim" in the description.
Should use the subfile 2654bs02

At Mon Nov 1 20:05:02 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Holly-Wood
Comments:
Changed subfile, changed light blue color, fixed unmatched vertices, changed description

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Nov 1 20:40:01 2021, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Fri Nov 19 13:40:01 2021, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
added new cond-lines subfiles

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed May 18 09:00:01 2022 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Tue Sep 27 20:05:01 2022 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Tue Sep 27 20:05:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Added "Dark Bluish" to the description.

At Tue Sep 27 20:10:01 2022 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Tue Sep 27 20:10:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Added missing whitespaces in front of 2 x 2.

At Tue Sep 27 20:20:01 2022, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
This triangle
3 320 -5.25 7.4329 -5.2 -5.3033 7.425 -5.3033 -5.2179 7.4343 -5.2179
is BFC invers.
At Tue Oct 4 09:25:01 2022, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Holly-Wood
Comments:
Fixed BFC error.

How on earth did you find this???

Existing certification-votes were deleted.