Unofficial File parts/26022.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Train Track Roller Coaster Straight  4 x  8
0 Name: 26022.dat
0 Author: Gerald Lasser [GeraldLasser]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
3 subfiles aren't certified. (SSSN)
Size: 3937 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue May 1 22:50:00 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
At Wed May 2 08:30:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks good, more when I have te parts in hand! I should be able to start the train parts soon (if you don't mind).

At Wed May 23 16:45:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
As far as I can tell, it should be "Roller Coaster", not "Rollercoaster"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roller_coaster

At Thu May 24 21:25:00 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
spelling

Philo, you know, German words can be endless :-)

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri May 25 08:15:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes I know, though my German is pretty rusty ;D

While I generally don't mind much about T-junctions, I don't like bleeding... so I think the bottom quads at lines 27/35 should be interrupted on sleepers (but top quads lines 28/36 shouldn't be changed to keep nice smoothing).

At Fri Jun 1 18:15:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Another minor one: thr studs should be rotated 90 degrees (and could use a stug-2x1.dat primitive)

At Sun Sep 30 20:30:02 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing complementary cond-line on the rails.

At Tue Nov 20 20:30:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
@Magnus, did you mean the condlines I added now?

@Philo, I compared other rails, they have the same geometry at the sleepers?

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Nov 21 17:50:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, but you only need to add the ones on the inside slopes.
The top surface condlines are not needed.

Corrected stud orientation.

Still have surfaces bleeding on the bottom of the rails

At Thu Nov 22 08:00:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: GeraldLasser
Comments:
...finally. Bleeding removed

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Nov 22 21:25:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
It is also possible to add that surface in the subfiles instead.