Unofficial File parts/25375-f2.dat
File Header:
0 Tassel Hanging from Side
0 Name: 25375-f2.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Minifig Accessory
0 !HISTORY 2016-10-05 {LEGO Digital Designer} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2016-10-10 [Philo] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
Status:
Needs admin review. (CCN)
Size: 478 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify MMR1988=certify MagFors=novote Philo=novote Steffen=novote cwdee=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Oct 10 13:50:00 2016, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Not really convinced by the category I used...
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Not really convinced by the category I used...
At Tue Nov 8 16:50:01 2016, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Don't know what to think of these parts.
Do we have any similar, previous part made of two pieces?
a + b = f1 or f2.
part + part = part
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Don't know what to think of these parts.
Do we have any similar, previous part made of two pieces?
a + b = f1 or f2.
part + part = part
At Wed Nov 9 07:35:00 2016, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
In my eyes chains like: 92338c01.dat are similar.
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
In my eyes chains like: 92338c01.dat are similar.
At Wed Nov 9 08:15:00 2016, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Indeed, Max, you are right!
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Indeed, Max, you are right!
At Tue Dec 27 11:15:00 2016, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Tue Dec 27 11:30:00 2016, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as said before, I do not like this new ...-f2 filename suffix.
I only find it confusing and unnecessary.
I can't understand why simply using
25375c01.dat
should not be enough here.
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as said before, I do not like this new ...-f2 filename suffix.
I only find it confusing and unnecessary.
I can't understand why simply using
25375c01.dat
should not be enough here.
At Tue Dec 27 20:05:00 2016, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I agree.
I would like to see this changed to 25375c02.dat
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I agree.
I would like to see this changed to 25375c02.dat
At Sat Dec 2 12:00:00 2017, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I support the partnumber suffix.
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I support the partnumber suffix.
At Wed Dec 6 19:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Renumber?
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Renumber?
At Mon Jun 3 13:15:02 2019, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
At Sat Aug 31 14:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Not sure whether to use -f1/-f2 or c01/c02.
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Not sure whether to use -f1/-f2 or c01/c02.
3D View