Unofficial File parts/25375-f1.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Tassel Hanging from Top
0 Name: 25375-f1.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Minifig Accessory

0 !HISTORY 2016-10-05 {LEGO Digital Designer} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2016-10-10 [Philo] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)
Size: 471 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
Steffen=novote
cwdee=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Tassel Support
Status: Needs admin review. (CCX)
~Tassel
Status: Needs admin review. (CCX)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Oct 10 13:45:01 2016, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Not really convinced by the category I used...

At Tue Nov 8 16:50:01 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Don't know what to think of these parts.
Do we have any similar, previous part made of two pieces?

a + b = f1 or f2.
part + part = part
At Tue Nov 8 18:05:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
nothing similar yet... single mold for two separated part!

At Tue Dec 27 11:15:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Dec 27 11:30:01 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as said before, I do not like this new ...-f1 filename suffix.
I only find it confusing and unnecessary.
I can't understand why simply using
25375c01.dat
should not be enough here.

At Tue Dec 27 20:05:00 2016, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I agree.
I would like to see this changed to 25375c01.dat
At Tue Nov 28 05:50:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is this analagous to the minifg chains? I believe that they are cleverly created in a single mould.

At Tue Nov 28 07:50:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes. Compositing "parts" should now get a Flexible_section qualifier.

At Sat Dec 2 12:00:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I support the partnumber suffix.

At Wed Dec 6 19:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Renumber?

At Mon Jun 3 13:15:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.