Unofficial File parts/18585.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Technic Brick  2 x  4 with Holes and Launcher
0 Name: 18585.dat
0 Author: Massimo Maso [Sirio]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Ninjago

0 !HISTORY 2018-01-28 {LEGO Digital Designer} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2020-04-18 [Sirio] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker

0 // Subparts
Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 24780 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Apr 21 08:25:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
In the images of the instructions the studs appear full, but in the photos on the internet they are drilled like those of the Technic elements.
I used some primitives "cyls" even if they mean the introduction of some T-junctions.

At Fri Apr 24 17:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing an edge on the "base of the launcher cylinder"

At Sun Apr 26 07:00:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat May 2 09:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I find it strange that the center of the spinner socket is placed at y = 9.5. Think it should be placed "in system", at y = 10.

An assembly like this is possible in LDD
1 36 0 120 -10 0 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 1 0 18585.dat
1 0 30 100 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 44294.dat
1 0 -30 20 0 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 44294.dat
1 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 18590.dat
1 47 -30 100 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 32013.dat

I don't have the parts, so I can't tell if it is possible IRL.

At Thu May 14 06:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Moved launcher at y = 10.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon May 18 09:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I don't understand these areas, on both sides, could be simplified, should be flat:
4 4 55 6 -16.70442 52 3 -15.966 38 3 -15.966 38 10 -17.5
4 4 45.876 -2.374 -12.374 40 -2.3744 -12.3744 40 0 -13.961 45.876 0 -13.961

Missing edge line, on both sides:
2 14 52 3 -15.966 52 3 -20

At Wed May 20 06:45:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun May 24 14:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I still see the same errors.

At Tue May 26 06:10:02 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Jun 4 16:15:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm sorry, but the same errors are still present.

These surfaces should be flat:
4 5 55 6 16.704 38 10 17.5 38 3 15.966 52 3 15.966
4 5 55 6 -16.70442 52 3 -15.966 38 3 -15.966 38 10 -17.5
4 11 40 -2.3744 -12.3744 40 0 -13.961 46 0 -13.961 45.876 -2.374 -12.374
4 11 40 0 13.961 40 -2.3744 12.3744 45.876 -2.374 12.374 46 0 13.961
At Tue Jun 9 05:45:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Jun 22 18:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Still not flat enough:
4 11 40 -2.3744 -12.3744 40 0 -13.961 46 0 -13.961 45.876 -2.374 -12.374
4 11 40 0 13.961 40 -2.3744 12.3744 45.876 -2.374 12.374 46 0 13.961

At Fri Jun 26 06:05:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Jul 15 20:50:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Thank you.

At Sat Sep 26 22:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
this 1-4cyls :
1 4 55 3 16.70442 0 0 -3 3 0 0 0 -1 0 1-4cyls.dat

Can be adjusted to fit tightly as
1 1 55 3 16.70442 0 0 -3 3 0 0 0 -.5963 0 1-4cyls.dat

SO you can also replace
2 4 52 3 16.1077 52.228 4.148 16.3361
2 4 52.228 4.148 16.3361 52.879 5.121 16.5296
2 4 52.879 5.121 16.5296 53.852 5.7717 16.659
2 4 53.852 5.7717 16.659 55 6 16.704

with an
1 1 55 3 16.10812 0 0 -3 3 0 0 0.5963 1 0 1-4edge.dat

THen the area can be modeled insted of
3 4 52 3 16.1077 52.228 4.148 16.3361 38 10 17.5
3 4 38 10 17.5 52.228 4.148 16.3361 52.879 5.121 16.5296
3 4 38 10 17.5 52.879 5.121 16.5296 53.852 5.7717 16.659
3 4 38 10 17.5 53.852 5.7717 16.659 55 6 16.704
3 4 38 10 17.5 38 3 16.1077 52 3 16.1077

like this:
3 1 55 6 16.704 38 10 17.5 52 6 16.70442
4 1 38 3 16.1077 52 3 16.1077 52 6 16.70442 38 10 17.5
1 1 55 3 16.10812 0 0 -3 3 0 0 0.5963 1 0 1-4ndis.dat
At Tue Sep 29 19:45:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Comments:
Fixed

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Sep 30 18:15:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
BFC errors on one side.
A vertex at one of subfiles is still in the old position.

At Thu Oct 1 20:15:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Oct 1 21:35:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Unmatched edges
2 4 29 1 20 28 18 20
2 4 28 18 20 11 19 20

At Sat Oct 3 13:30:02 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Sirio
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sun Oct 25 19:50:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Oct 25 20:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.